The Associated Press, a organization with so little respect for fair use that they expect you to pay for a license to quote as little as five words from its articles, describes how it relied on fair use to do reporting on Sarah Palin's memoir Glowing Rouge:
"The AP was determined to get the first copy," Oreskes [a senior managing editor] wrote, detailing how the writers learned a store had "inadvertently placed the book on sale five days before its official Nov. 17 release date." "They bought a copy, ripped it from its spine and scanned it into the system so it could be read and electronically searched," he wrote.As Rebecca Tushnet notes, this is fair use. And so is quoting the AP.
Actually, the AP likes fair use after all (via @CathyGellis)
Previously:
- Associated Press threatens AP affiliate over YouTube channel ...
- Stanford Fair Use Center needs your Mannie Garcia Obama photo ...
- Shepard Fairey's Comment on Recent Updates in the AP Legal ...
- Media Bloggers Association -- who they are (and they aren't ...
- MIT Press takes gutsy fair use stand - Boing Boing
- Associated Press DRM diagram demystified (with cuss-words) - Boing ...
RSS Feed
*facepalm* Are they serious? How does that even work? What kind of ridiculous twists do they have to do in their mind to properly balance these actions? It makes no sense, and boggles my mind.
Stupid. Just stupid.
Noah
Really? Scanning the _entire_ book in to make it searchable for purposes of commentary is legal?
What if someone at the AP downloaded the scanned text to their flash drive, is that legal - if they say they intend to do research so they can write an article about it for the AP? And then what if their roommate/spouse/friend reads it while it's there?
None of this should be construed as a defense of DRM or misguided copyright laws - I'm really trying to ask questions to determine just where fair use would stop in this instance.
I can the understand the viewpoint here about AP using double standards, but I believe that scanning and searching the book electronically is allowed under fair use... as long as only one person had access to the file at once, if they bought 1 book but allowed 10 reports access to the file simultaneously then they would owe the publishers for 9 more copies right?
Knowing the AP - as soon as they had the book paid for they probably also informed the store of its mistake to prevent other news services from getting a copy then called the publisher and asked for reaction comments about the store selling illegal early releases..
I don't think selling the book early is illegal - it might violate a contract they have with the publisher, and therefore might be 'breach of contract' I guess. I think, though, that if they don't want the book to be sold until the Nth day of the month, they shouldn't have it delivered until the (N-1)th. If the store has it in stock, why not sell it?
"Knowing the AP - as soon as they had the book paid for they probably also informed the store of its mistake to prevent other news services from getting a copy then called the publisher and asked for reaction comments about the store selling illegal early releases.."
Ever the high road...
I would wonder how many people were accessing the electronic version at one time. I will presume the answer will be well each person was looking at a different page.
Someone should ask the AP if they think 100 people can listen to the same Video/CD at the same in 100 different places just because they have a slight time shift in the audio?
Can we report this to the British and have the AP's net access removed?
I believe that scanning and searching the book electronically is allowed under fair use... as long as only one person had access to the file at once, if they bought 1 book but allowed 10 reports access to the file simultaneously then they would owe the publishers for 9 more copies right?
So many contrivances to keep bored people busy...
That should be 10 reporters not reports in #3.. Also Cory, does changing the book name to "Glowing Rouge" now make it a parody instead of a quote thus releasing you of the need to pay for any licensing?
Rouge goes on your face, rogues do it from behind.
Sed-a-give?! I mean, Glowing Rouge?! It's Going Rogue. I'm not sure which title is dumber, but we should try to get it right.
I'm starting to think that Bong-Bong is messing up the name of her book to reduce their future workload - that way, when Red Staters google for reviews, they won't stumble on this site and fill the comment section with posts that will eventually need to be disemvowelled.
May I also suggest:
- Throwing Pogue
- Boeing Drogue
- Showing Vogue
Since Ms. Palin is so entrepreneurial at the moment, we just need to convince her that she'd make a lot of money by suing the AP. She already hates the "media", so a lawsuit should be a win-win for fair use and lolz.
NewsBusters: AP Redefines Fair Use
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mithridate-ombud/2009/11/23/ap-redefines-fair-use
Boing Drogue ?
I appreciate the irony here. You're absolutely right. But there is a big difference between what the AP is doing and what they're complaining about. Breaking a book apart, scanning it and using it around the office is only going to be read by the reporters on the project. It's equivalent to time-shifting or format-shifting.
The AP's licensing scheme is designed to stop people from reprinting stories and sharing them with everyone on the web. It's easy to find blogs that cut and paste the meat of good articles without adding much of anything. It isn't fair for them to earn ad revenue that should really go to the people doing the work.
So even though both of these actions are gathered under the term "fair use", they're really very different actions.
Doing Moog!
So the AP gets to play Kalvinball with copyright law whenever it suits their ends? The hypocrisy is terribly thick this time.
For the only time ever, I am going to advocate for Caribou Barbie: sue the ever-loving shiznit out of the AP, they have made a pirate copy of your book for their gain. This is not fair use, this is theft.
It's all fun and Fair Use...
...until someone copies your work.
It's like a Law of the Internet, or something.
@14:
Boeing Drogue:
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q4/081219b_pr.html