Since 1983, when The Gift came out, Hyde has stayed busy, writing a second book, Trickster Makes This World, and various longer essays, the most recent of which is "Frames from the Framers: How America's Revolutionaries Imagined Intellectual Property." Starting with George Lakoff's idea that conservatives "frame" issues better than liberals, Hyde explains how "the entertainment industry has also been very good at framing its issues." The entertainment industry asserts that downloading an MP3 is the same thing as shoplifting shoes, and anyone who disagrees has to do so in and through their terms.Framing the Issue: Copyright from John Adams to mp3scoverIn the rest of his essay, Hyde tries to describe an alternative: "the democracy frame" imagined by Jefferson, Madison, and Adams. Hyde begins at the beginning, tracing the previous "frames" for art and creativity--they're gifts from the gods, a God, a muse, and on down the line. But Hyde really gets going in the early modern period, when people started talking about intellectual property through "land" metaphors like the "commonwealth," the "estate," and "monopoly." Eventually, Hyde works in ideas like civic republicanism vs. commercial republicanism, feudal titles vs. allodial titles, and legal privileges vs. natural rights. It all ties in to the creative commons--it really does--and you should read the whole thing.
Frames from the Framers: How America's Revolutionaries Imagined Intellectual Property
(Thanks, Craig!)

I think this is a fascinating thesis. I also think it's worth noting that these men were, for the most part, alright with the idea of human beings as property.
I was lucky enough to have Lewis Hyde as a professor at Kenyon College last winter, and enjoyed the hell out of his class, "Framing Intellectual Property Rights," which overlaps with the content of this essay. He is a fascinating guy, and an engaging professor. Sad that I only discovered him when I was a senior.
And for my fellow FIPR scholars, I miss you all, and send you a hearty "arhight!"
Lewis Hyde's The Gift is one of the truly important books in my life--idiosyncratic and off-center though it is, it set off explosions in the way I think that haven't stopped reverberating. Lewis Hyde did a lot to set the stage for my later agreement with (for instance) Cory's critiques of overweening copyright.
I had not realized that The Gift's subtitle has changed over time. When I read it, it was "Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property." Now it's "Creativity and the Artist in the Modern World." I agree with the Amazon commenter that neither subtitle quite captures this brilliant, but flawed, but brilliant book.
Someday we might just live in a better world because of Lewis Hyde.
Arhight!
Also see: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/books/review/Hyde-t.html