Mercedes Lackey embraces fanfic and Creative Commons

Chris sez, "Mercedes Lackey's agent, who also represents a 'persuasive little gnome' named Cory Doctorow, has been talked around to the Creative Commons point of view. Hence, Misty has announced she is going to permit fanfic as long as it is released under a Creative Commons license (presumably a noncommercial one, though she does not explicitly spell this out on the site)."

Misty Lackey's work is well-loved by fanfic writers; this allows them to come in from the cold and produce their work (which celebrates her work) without fear of legal reprisals. Good move all around (and my agent, Russ Galen, is a smart cookie!).

What this means is: NO, you cannot make money on it. NO, you cannot self-publish a fanfiction novel of Valdemar (or any of my other stuff) and try and sell it on Amazon. And NO, I still am not going to read it, because I am already so far behind on my research reading I barely have time to read that.

But YES, you may write and post away, folks, so long as you license it as derivative and under Creative Commons. If it is anything other than PG-13, please take all the proper precautions to stick it somewhere that innocent souls won't be corrupted. Do not scare the children or the horses. Have fun!

News: Concerning Fanfiction: (Thanks, Chris!)

11 Comments

| Leave a comment

I thought this was going to be about some shill for Daimler-Benz trolling the site: "Hey Cory, I love the way you publish your books and I love reading them after a long drive in the fabulous new E-Class with its traction control and intelligent breaking".

For obvious reasons, I felt compelled to comment. :p
This is good news. Glad to hear it. :)

Most fanfic writers already add disclaimers (sometimes as succinct as "not mine; don't sue"), and I assume that Lackey doesn't have the time to check if fanficcers have expanded theirs to "not mine; don't sue; used as per Ms. Lackey's Creative Commons license."

So, my point is, this is nice and all, and it's awesome that she's decided to cc license her work, but I don't think it's going to change fan response significantly. The people who love her fiction are already writing fanfic and weren't waiting for her approval. They may or may not append their disclaimers. They already knew they couldn't sell their work.

In sum, welcome to the status quo, Ms. Lackey.

Query for Ms. Lackey: Is this limited to prose? (I've heard conflicting reports about how comfortable you were with having your older songs adapted/adopted.)

rachelb, I think that's true -- fanfic writers' behaviors likely won't change much.

What does change is that a well-known author is explicitly saying that she or her publisher will NOT sue someone who writes and posts fanfic, or a website that hosts it. She's explicitly saying that noncommercial derivative works are okay with her. Up until now, putting a disclaimer on your story that said "not mine, don't sue" did precisely nothing from a legal standpoint. If they wanted to sue, they'd sue.

It's more of a mindset change.

That's a change. Back on Usenet, her lawyer was known for popping into fan groups and denouncing fanfic.

In the early 90's, I used to be highly involved in her "Queen's Own" fan community on GEnie. (Anybody remember CL/WELCOME? Embarrassingly enough, that was me.) As I recall, she pretty much encouraged fanfic with certain restrictions (chiefly about the use of her characters).

Times have changed I guess.

Hi Cory! It's Misty. Um, lessee, verification, "Russ Galen's hobby is gourmet cookery and he has three kids." Thanks for the shout-out. What's changed here is that Russ used to track down online fanfic sites and tell them to shut down or else. I have always supported fanfic (I started writing by writing fanfic) but Russ in the past has regarded it with the same warmth as one does a cockroach infestation. Now (my guess is) he regards it as one does a Chia Pet. Not something he wants, but...eh...ok. I will admit that certain kinds of fanfic squik me out, but like I said...not where children or horses will be frightened, and I am not about to be a brain censor. As for the songs--look, guys, before I wrote fanfic *I* was writing lyrics. Wouldn't it be a lot more fun and creative if you wrote your OWN lyrics instead of mucking around with mine? Adapting mine would be the equivalent of rewriting one of the books. Why bother?

OH! And don't forget to visit our free superhero podcast (next year to be Baen books!) www.secretworldchronicles.com which ITSELF started out as fanfic!

Upon further thought, it may well be it needs to be a *not* noncommercial CC license. If the purpose is to protect Misty legally if she should use some similar to idea in the fanfic in a book, then the fanfic would need to be under a license that permits commercial (as in, her published book) use.

I know a Valdemar fan who refrained from writing the fanfic he had planned specifically because of Lackey's ban. (Well, it's the first part of a still-largely-unwritten larger series that has the protagonist traveling from universe to universe.) So the increase in fanfic being written might be more than you think. Remember, fans of an author's work tend to want to respect said author's wishes.

It's nice to hear news like this, but I've always had trouble appreciating how authors can feel such ownership of their work to 'ban' fanfiction in the first place. If you don't like it, nobody's forcing you to read it, and I've never heard of a fanfic author trying to make money off their work in any case. Worst case scenario, the fanfic is better than the original. In which case most of the readers will have read (& presumably bought) the original anyways, so no sales lost. Not that this is the best place to argue this! Oh for threaded commenting...

I can see Caroline's point though, nobody lives in fear of being sued for fanfic, but it's a definite possibility. Being legit for a change is... interesting and I appreciate the gesture.

I guess my point is, it's nice that Ms Lackey has CC-licensed her book, but expecting fanfic writers to a) care enough about the author's opinions to find out their stance on fanfic, b) know what a creative commons license is, and c) attach one of those buttons to every one of their fic is rather unrealistic. Better to just let us get on with it and trust to the community etiquette of disclaimers and noncommercial use.

Leave a comment

Anonymous

More items

The woman who can't stop orgasming

The following true story was told to me by a woman who chooses to remain anonymous for privacy reasons. If you think you have Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder, you can visit this forum for help. I had my first orgasm at the age of 17. I was sitting at my desk at school when all of a sudden, I fe... More.

Freakonomics Sequel Gets Climate Change Wrong

The Freakonomics guys have apparently either really dropped the ball when it comes to understanding science, or they're willfully ignoring it. Either way, I'm pretty disappointed. The sequel's contrarian take on climate change--and the bad science it's steeped in--have been analyzed in exquisite de... More.

Infographic: Left vs Right

Clark Kent told us about this "thought-provoking, artful schematic that explains the differences in basic political philosophy between progressives and conservatives." It was created by David McCandless and Stefanie Posavec, and appears in The Visual Miscellaneum, which comes out on November 10. I... More.

Voting machine source-code leak shows election-rigging subroutines?

Sequouia, a company that makes many of the electronic voting machines used in the US and elsewhere, has inadvertently leaked much of the secret source-code that powers its systems. The first cut at analysis shows what looks like illegal election-rigging code ("code that appears to control or at leas... More.

Mercedes Lackey embraces fanfic and Creative Commons

Chris sez, "Mercedes Lackey's agent, who also represents a 'persuasive little gnome' named Cory Doctorow, has been talked around to the Creative Commons point of view. Hence, Misty has announced she is going to permit fanfic as long as it is released under a Creative Commons license (presumably a n... More.

Recent Comments

  • "It's nice to hear news like this, but I've always had trouble appreciating how authors can feel such ownership of their work to 'ban' fanfiction in the first place. If you don't like it, nobody's forcing you to read it, and I've never heard of a fanfic author trying to make money off their work in any case. Worst case scenario, the fanfic is better than the original. In which case most of the readers will have read (& presumably bought) the original anyways, so no sales lost. Not that this is the best p..."
  • "I know a Valdemar fan who refrained from writing the fanfic he had planned specifically because of Lackey's ban. (Well, it's the first part of a still-largely-unwritten larger series that has the protagonist traveling from universe to universe.) So the increase in fanfic being written might be more than you think. Remember, fans of an author's work tend to want to respect said author's wishes...."
  • "Upon further thought, it may well be it needs to be a *not* noncommercial CC license. If the purpose is to protect Misty legally if she should use some similar to idea in the fanfic in a book, then the fanfic would need to be under a license that permits commercial (as in, her published book) use...."
  • "Hi Cory! It's Misty. Um, lessee, verification, "Russ Galen's hobby is gourmet cookery and he has three kids." Thanks for the shout-out. What's changed here is that Russ used to track down online fanfic sites and tell them to shut down or else. I have always supported fanfic (I started writing by writing fanfic) but Russ in the past has regarded it with the same warmth as one does a cockroach infestation. Now (my guess is) he regards it as one does a Chia Pet. Not something he wants, but...eh...ok. I..."
  • "In the early 90's, I used to be highly involved in her "Queen's Own" fan community on GEnie. (Anybody remember CL/WELCOME? Embarrassingly enough, that was me.) As I recall, she pretty much encouraged fanfic with certain restrictions (chiefly about the use of her characters). Times have changed I guess...."
  • "That's a change. Back on Usenet, her lawyer was known for popping into fan groups and denouncing fanfic...."
  • "rachelb, I think that's true -- fanfic writers' behaviors likely won't change much. What does change is that a well-known author is explicitly saying that she or her publisher will NOT sue someone who writes and posts fanfic, or a website that hosts it. She's explicitly saying that noncommercial derivative works are okay with her. Up until now, putting a disclaimer on your story that said "not mine, don't sue" did precisely nothing from a legal standpoint. If they wanted to sue, they'd sue. It's more o..."
  • "Query for Ms. Lackey: Is this limited to prose? (I've heard conflicting reports about how comfortable you were with having your older songs adapted/adopted.)..."
  • "Most fanfic writers already add disclaimers (sometimes as succinct as "not mine; don't sue"), and I assume that Lackey doesn't have the time to check if fanficcers have expanded theirs to "not mine; don't sue; used as per Ms. Lackey's Creative Commons license." So, my point is, this is nice and all, and it's awesome that she's decided to cc license her work, but I don't think it's going to change fan response significantly. The people who love her fiction are already writing fanfic and weren't waiting for ..."
  • "For obvious reasons, I felt compelled to comment. :p This is good news. Glad to hear it. :) ..."