Touchable holography




Professor Hiroyuki Shinoda and his colleagues at Tokyo University are making headway in haptic holography, 3D projections you can actually feel. I first experienced something like this probably 15 years ago at the late holography pioneer Steve Benton's laboratory at MIT's Media Lab. Back then, the hologram was grainy and grayscale and the physical feedback came from a handheld Phantom stylus that provided some sensation of touching a real object. Based on this demonstration, it appears that the technology has come a long way. From Reuters:
By using ultrasonic waves, the scientists have developed software that creates pressure when a user's hand "touches" a hologram that is projected.

In order to track a user's hand, the researchers use control sticks from Nintendo's popular Wii gaming system that are mounted above the hologram display area.

The technology has so far been tested with relatively simple objects, although the researchers have more practical plans, including virtual switches at hospitals, for example, and other places where contamination by touch is an issue.
"Japan scientists create 3-D images you can touch" (Reuters, thanks Bob Pescovitz!)

Touchable Holography (University of Tokyo)


Discussion

Report this comment

The youtube graphic looks like a face!

Report this comment
#2 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 12:13 PM

hot diggity, my star trek dream world is closer than ever!

Report this comment

Hellooo, Counselor Troi!

Report this comment
#4 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 12:16 PM

How long until we can have sex with holograms?


...Come on, you know you wondered.

Report this comment

Hellooo, Counselor Troi!

Qapla' Worf!

Report this comment

I wonder if the ultrasonic waves bother animals? Like a dog whistle would...

Report this comment
#7 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 1:32 PM

That. Is. AWESOME. All those awesome holographic interfaces they have in the movies are now technically possible!

Report this comment

Don't they know the holodeck ALWAYS runs amok?

Report this comment

@ Moriarty:

"Damn! The last time that happened, I got slapped with three paternity suits!"
-Zapp Brannigan

Report this comment
#10 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 1:49 PM

Kind of reminds me of Umberto Eco's "Travels in Hyper-reality", a series of essays about his trips to museums and such locales that claim to provide a version of reality "more real" than the original (for instance, "the last supper" recreated as a life-sized tableau vivant made of wax figures).

Report this comment
#11 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 2:45 PM

David, have you tried this? I did at SIGGRAPH, and the experience and claims don't line up.

The touch sensation was faint and not evocative of any real touch. The visual part just did not work-- the perceived depth was further away than the intended volume, and the viewer's eyes had to be at a specific height, making it very difficult to see it at all unless you're ~5'7".

Report this comment

Sounds like it's more of a force-feedback thing that actual touch.

Report this comment
#14 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 4:13 PM

Haptic demos should be tried before posted. This thing was a real letdown at Siggraph this year. The only reason it's being making the rounds online is because it sounds good on paper.

Report this comment
#15 posted by Anonymous, September 17, 2009 4:27 PM

A rather crude imitation of the virtual reality in which we all currently reside.
It's been done.

Report this comment

Siggraph always has plenty of cool-sounding demos that aren't very impressive in person (and thankfully a few that are). Several years back I tried a demo of an interface that was supposed to simulate biting into food. Suffice it to say, nobody was going to mistake that sanitized pneumatic pressure gauge for an actual apple.

Report this comment

brainspore, was that the cracker simulating one? I remember that.

Report this comment

Phased-array ultrasonic transducer. Gotta like that.

Report this comment

MDH: The sad thing was that I couldn't tell which setting was supposed to simulate a cracker and which was supposed to be an apple. I felt so bad for the technicians who polled me afterward.

Report this comment
#20 posted by Anonymous, September 18, 2009 1:23 PM

Doesn't CNN have this already?

Report this comment

These Wright brothers, they only flew for a few seconds. In their inflight meal, I couldn't tell the difference between a cracker and an apple... flight will never be a commercial venture.

Leave a comment

Name:
Anonymous