Imaginary Foundation's All-Star Pattern Seekers Trading Cards
Our friends at the Imaginary Foundation have just published a wonderful set of trading cards featuring their favorite big thinkers and sensemakers. The All-Star Pattern Seekers Trading Cards "pay tribute to 23 giants of pattern recognition -- pathfinders and ideanauts whose shadows loom large across three millennia of discovery." Included are the likes of Buckminster Fuller, Marshall McLuhan, Marie Curie, James Lovelock, Hubble Telecope, Joseph Campbell, and many others. Click the image above to see them all. The set, in an embossed box, is $18. Also available is a new t-shirt design: "To understand is to perceive patterns." Each shirt includes 7 of the trading cards. Imaginary Foundation


the latest
latest episodes
eighteen bones for 23 cards? i'm perceiving a pattern, and it's "more money than sense"
@Davep:
The pattern I'm perceiving is 1 woman, 2 machines, and 21 men. And not one of them non-white. Good job, Imaginary Foundation!
U.S. right wing demands a 24th card be added featuring St. Ronald of Reagan begin in 5....4....3....2...
At first, I see nothing. But now I have had my mushrooms, and I see the Apocalypse.
I always see the Apocalypse. So there is probably no cause for alarm.
Unless I'm right. That does happen from time to time.
I'm interested in hearing who would be in other people's personal sets of cards... Mine wouldn't necessarily be "pattern seekers," but anyway: Andy Warhol, William S. Burroughs, Jacques Vallee, JG Ballard, Brion Gysin, Yoko Ono, John Lennon, Timothy Leary, PT Barnum, Stewart Brand, RU Sirius... I better stop while I'm a head. ; )
Are they trading cards if you buy them as a set? Shouldn't you get one with every chocolate frog and have to actually trade your duplicates to make a complete set?
Mendeleev please.
Saw the pattern and used it to predict the discovery of, and the properties of previously unknown elements.
Lakoff but no Mendeleev???? Surely some mistake!!
#5 David Pescovitz,
Benoit Mandelbrot, Georges Braque, Joseph Beuys, Bridget Riley, Richard Feynmann, Martin Gardner, Buckminster Fuller, Daniel Dennett, Philip K Dick, Alfred Jarry, Samuel Beckett, Ludwig Wittgenstein, William Blake, Rosa Luxemburg, Antonio Gramsci, R D Laing, Eric Satie, John Cage, Robert Hooke, Marcel Duchamp, Mark E Smith, David Hume, David Lindsay, Thomas Pynchon, Alexander Rodchenko, Sigmar Polke, Arnold Geulincx.
There are also these folks called "Structuralists" "Post-structuralists" and "Deconstructionists"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structuralism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poststructuralism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_thinkers_influenced_by_deconstruction
Evariste Galois - group theory
William Kingdon Clifford, FRS - Clifford algebra (the algebra of physics, in particular the Dirac theory of the electron), proposed that mass and energy are curvatures of space more than 30 years before Einstein
Richard Feynman - Feynman diagrams, quantum electrodynamics, Feynman Lectures, nanotechnology, etc.
Claude Shannon - information theory
Jagadis Chandra Bose, FRS - inventor of radio, millimeter-wave remote-control in the 1890s
Carl Friedrich Gauss - the greatest mathematician
Robert Hooke, FRS - discoverer of cells and much else
Douglas Hofstadter - author of Godel, Escher Bach
Benjamin Franklin, FRS
Robert Anton Wilson - uncategorizable writing
Samuel Delany - SF writing
Gene Wolfe - fiction
K. Eric Drexler - molecular nanotechnology
Neal Stephenson - writing
Charles Stross - SF writing
Rudy Rucker - SF writing
Greg Egan - SF writing
John Brunner - wrote the most accurately predictive SF novel, The Shockwave Rider
Rene Magritte - painting
M. C. Escher - prints
Leonardo da Vinci - drawings, inventions, physics investigations
Gottfried Leibniz - mathematics and philosophy
Epicurus - the most scientific of the early Greek philosophers
I'm getting tired, but need to mention:
Homer, J.S. Mill, Montaigne, Jung, Pascal, Spinoza, Mark Twain, Lewis Caroll, Scott Adams, Bill Watterson, George Carlin, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Imhotep, and John Taylor Gatto
Watson and Crick? You mean the guys that ripped their research from their assistant? Pffft.
did Fibonacci really look like Frankenstein's monster?
Where is Mendeleev?
@12
Rosalind Franklin was not actually working for Watson and Crick. Also, her writings indicate that she was already aware of the structure of DNA by the time Watson and Crick were offered a sneak glance at plate 51. So really, shouldn't she maybe get a card, herself? Technically, she would have been eligible for the Nobel prize if she hadn't died five years prior to the decision to award it to Watson and Crick.
How 'bout Aristotle?
Figured out the basic pattern of narrative structure that is the foundation for much of western literature / theater / film / poetry / music.