Michigan public librarians Mary Kelly and Holly Hibner have a blog featuring awful library books. The book above, Those Amazing Leeches, is a prime example of an awful library book. Awful Library Books (Via Hang Fire Books)
Blog about awful library books
Leave a comment
More items
Boing Boing Moderation Policy
Comment Guidelines Thank you for being part of the Boing Boing community! Our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation, with "good" meaning fun, constructive, informative, entertaining, or all of the above. So, speech is free, but Boing Boing is moderated. Here are the kinds of c... More.
Cellphones and Cancer: OMG + FUD + WTF
Everyone's still confused about whether there's a link between cellphone use and cancer. In other news, everyone's still worried there may be a link between cellphone use and cancer. Safer either way, perhaps: use corded earbuds to reduce RF exposure?... More.
Graph compares rock music quality with US oil production 1949-2007
From GOOD: "The remarkable similarity between the arcs of U.S. oil production and songs in Rolling Stone’s “500 Greatest Songs of All Time” by year is staggering."... More.
Eleven myths of de-cluttering
Gretchen Rubin, author of the forthcoming book, The Happiness Project, offers several good de-cluttering tips in a blog post titled "Eleven Myths of De-Cluttering." Here are the first three: 1. "I need to get organized." No! Don't get organized is your first step. 2. "I need to be hyper-organize... More.
Sean Hannity plans to blame liberals for his mis-use of video
Predict what excuse Sean Hannity will use to explain why he misused old video to back up his claim that a large crowd came to Washington to protest the health care bill. (One rule: his excuse must somehow blame the liberals). ... More.
RSS Feed
I don't think there's anything wrong with leeches.
Leeches are our friends!
They are nature's anti-inflammatory medication!
Don't be so narrow-minded, Mark.
ohhh! gosh...
Reason six hundred and twenty three why you shouldn't eat dinner and read Boingboing.net at the same time.
Thing is, it's not even the leeches. It's that toe! oh, that toe.
This reminds me of so many library books that I never left back. I did my work experience in one and I can tell you the women who work there don't look too kindly on people who leave their books back late. Also they hate anyone that draws cocks and balls on the pages. Literary vandalism they call it. It worked for me in my A level English exam..I got a respectable E.
Willmarch
(Link provided by Glinner)
Its easy to forget that one man´s Awful is often another man´s Awesome...
Libraries pretty much make everything wonderful.
That weblog bothers me. Their main title says "Awful Library Books," but right below it they have a photo full of notably good books.
I used to catch those big, gray leeches when I was a child. They're good bait for white perch.
Teresa-sama! O genki?
g'wine down to tha rivah fer BBQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxlyKA9O9LA
any minute now
the leeches are scary, sure -- but the big toenail is a nightmare, indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1FQqSGxBso&feature=related
Awful? Yeah, how about awfully cool! (And FYI, Nerd stands for Never-Ending-Radical-Dude!)
The leaches aren't the awful part of the book cover, it's the feet.
What the hell is that on his big toe? It's not a leach tail or something...
Could have at least gotten a better foot model.
Although some of these are funny on sight, the overall concept of that website disturbs me a little bit.
The weeding idea that "these books contain inaccurate or outdated information, get them off the shelves" is a pretty big broom. Couldn't that be used to, for example, get rid of Jenny McCarthy's current Vaccines Cause Autism books, or any number of books that Somebody Might Disagree With, but others might want to read?
I'm just sayin'. Librarians may not always be the best judge of whether a book is useful to the non-librarian.
For example, their argument in one instance for removal seems to be that a book from the 1980s refers to AIDS instead of HIV. Maybe that caught-in-amber view would be useful to someone researching attitudes towards the disease over the decades.
It doesn't seem that big a leap to the banning of books, which doubtlessly these same librarians would stamp their feet at.
Maybe FAHRENHEIT 451 should be removed from all library shelves. It's set in a future where computers have not come to pass as they really have, so the book is out of date and inaccurate! Just a modest proposal...
I figured what they meant was books returned in horrid conditions--like burned or ripped out pages. Now that's horror.
So I should judge the book by its cover?
I gather what they mean is books that are outmoded (CARE AND FEEDING OF YOUR EIGHT-TRACK, though that isn't an actual example) and therefore worthy of "weeding" from libraries, so "awful" is at best misleading.
Apart from numerous instances of questionable judgment (with THOSE AMAZING LEECHES, this is once again truly a Directory of Wonderful Things), what really bothered me about the blog is their insistence on ending the first paragraph of virtually every entry with an exclamation point!
Look, libraries can't go weeding out all these books. Otherwise they'd end up with, like one shelf of nonfiction. Then how would they justify the budget for that huge new building?!
I think I checked out this book twice: once from the county I grew up in and once in the county I moved to in 7th grade. I am not ashamed.
Hang on folks. Before you go burning all the librarians...
Maintaining the collection is a legitimate part of what I do as a public librarian. Sometimes that means getting rid of -- weeding -- books. My section is the computer books. I cannot possibly leave all the Windows 3.1, Office 97, and Macromedia Flash books on my shelf, and still have room for books about Vista, MySQL, Rails, Ajax, and any other newer concept.
If you went to a library and asked for a book about starting a business and you were handed a book from 1987, would that suffice? Or you were looking for something to help you with a parent with Alzheimer's -- would you want the "latest" science research from 1992?
There are libraries that keep all book published, geared toward researchers. Large academic libraries -- like U of Michigan's -- can do this.
And all libraries -- academic and public -- strive for a balanced collection in every way.
But to think that somehow public librarians -- which Holly and Mary are -- should keep every book ever published in their collection, well, not possible and not desirable.
I loved reading their blog and will go back to it again. It's true that extremely crappy books can also be extremely cool, which is why they took the time to scan and upload this marvelous collection. Sure, they are saying what PJKWik, #21 is saying about attempting to provide healthy, up-to-date information to the public, which is their duty! It's a duty that is extremely hard to undertake as our collective consciousness is extremely MENTAL and fad-driven, or rather, torn between ideology and perceptions of emerging knowledge. Most of these books are presented by their publishers as sober reality but are in fact complete hogwash, which makes them fascinating cultural artifacts.
These librarians obviously love books and go beyond the call of duty by cataloging this aspect of their work, in fact rescuing this aspect of our culture.
If their work results in a purge at the library, that often results in cheap books for freaks like me that treasure them in table sales and giveaway boxes. Lighten up Boing-Boing! Sheesh, why are you here?
Also- That toe has suffered from a mild trauma which is why it was chosen to illustrate medical usage of leeches- they suck away the stagnant blood.It is a form of microsurgery to relieve venous pressure.
#3, Anonymous
Even famous playwrights.
I'd have loved to have found the leech book in a library when I was kid.
I was all set to comment, but PJKWIK said it far better than I could have. Weeding is a normal part of collection maintenance. It's not censorship. It's simply a reality of having finite shelf space.
Weeding is library maintenence. It is necessary. There is no way to keep every book a library ever purchased. There is not enough shelf space. I believe the blog these ladies created was simply for fun/laughs. Lighten up!!