Practical joke cocktails: freeze Mentos into the ice-cubes, add to Diet Coke drink


Wired's HOWTO wiki suggests freezing Mentos into ice cubes and then serving them in Diet Coke-based cocktails as a kind of timed practical joke (the cubes melt, and the drink turns into a volcano). Diet Coke is recommended "because it isn't sticky."

Mix an Exploding Drink (via Neatorama)

Newer Claw shoes

Discussion

Take a look at this

Well, I will have to try it but I can think of a few reasons why this wouldn't really work:

- Putting the Mentos in water to freeze would dissolve most of the cavitation points on the candy.
- Pouring the Diet Coke into a glass would degas it enough to prevent a lot of foaming
- By the time the ice melted enough to expose a Mentos, soda would have degassed even more
- Melting would not be uniform so there would not be very much Mentos exposed over time evenly

Take a look at this
#2 posted by Joe, June 3, 2009 10:50 PM

It won't work that well. As the Mentos/Diet Coke guys explained when they put on the show at Maker Faire, the Diet Coke needs to be room temperature for a good effect. If it's ice-cold not nearly as much fizz will come out of solution.

Take a look at this
#3 posted by Anonymous, June 3, 2009 11:09 PM

The reason it won't work is the fizz is not caused by gum arabic.
The fizz is caused by the multiple pits/points of nucleation on the mentos sugar coated candy. I have to admit i have not tried the prank because i am being a physics snob. If anyone can get it to work i will just be all like thumbs up without responding.

Take a look at this

Yeah it's funny but since I just got a lesson in this at Maker Faire, I'm very skeptical. The prankster has been pranked!

Take a look at this
#5 posted by Anonymous, June 3, 2009 11:49 PM

it would taste horrible even though it probably wouldn't work

Take a look at this

All you naysayers with your learning. Then you're at a party and somebody's HEAD BLOWS OFF. And it's FUNNY.

Where's your science then?

Take a look at this
#7 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 12:28 AM

Nah, the bestest practical joke I've seen in a while is the fake Scientology Ad on the bOINGbOING page...

...oh wait, WTF, a REAL scientology ad.

now how the hell did that get through!!!!!

Take a look at this
The reason it won't work is the fizz is not caused by gum arabic. The fizz is caused by the multiple pits/points of nucleation on the mentos sugar coated candy. I have to admit i have not tried the prank because i am being a physics snob. If anyone can get it to work i will just be all like thumbs up without responding.

The Mythbusters actually did a really thorough episode all about the diet coke and mentos thing. It is caused by the gum arabic... AND by the nucleation sites, AND by the artificial sweetener. The spectacular results are due to all the individual factors adding up. Each one does cause the carbonation to want to leave the solution.

Take a look at this
#9 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 12:36 AM

and in addition to all of the above, Mythbusters found that it's the combination of DIET Coke that makes the reaction to begin with...it fizzes with regular Coke, lemon-lime soda, etc., etc....but if you have Mentos frozen in water (dissolved points of nucleation) in a POURED (read: partially degassed) glass of Diet Coke, it's not going to be all that grate, akshully.

Take a look at this
#10 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 12:56 AM

I remember this trick. Wait, no, that used roofies, not mentos.

Take a look at this

wouldn't work in europa as nobody drinks cola - diet or not.

Take a look at this
#12 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 1:53 AM

"Diet Coke is recommended "because it isn't sticky.""

Didn't mythbusters prove that the aspartam in "diet" soft drinks enhances the effect ?

Take a look at this

I've been disappointed with the whole Mentos and Diet Coke thing ever since I bought a value pack of Mentos and it *came with a special plastic tube for dropping the Mentos into the Diet Coke*.

Take a look at this

Uebertragung,

surely that's on Europa?

Take a look at this

All these drinks are yours, except Europa. Attempt no cola there.

Well, I do enjoy Afri-Cola, and that's from Germany. Or do you mean some other Europa?

Take a look at this

If you want to see a spectacular fizz, just tap a open beer bottle with a glass or other bottle.

Disclaimer: I'm from Belgium and this works great on beer bottles here. They've always been chilled when I've seen this happen, but I don't know if that matters.

Disclaimer 2: This is fucking annoying when you don't expect it so don't do it to someone else, children.

Take a look at this
#17 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 5:25 AM

I am just wondering (sorry to be a downer) but I often eat ice cubes. Could this maybe chip a tooth or say damage your stomach maybe if someone swallowed the ice cube and then drunk a bunch of diet coke out of the can? Actually starting to sound a little scary. Maybe not such a great idea.

Take a look at this

Diet Coke is recommended "because it isn't sticky."

Also recommended "because this trick will not work with regular Coke."

Take a look at this
#19 posted by Ned613, June 4, 2009 6:49 AM

Diet Coke is recommended "because it isn't sticky."

Also recommended because regular coke would violate the practical joker's code of ethics.

Take a look at this
#20 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 7:05 AM

On Europa, all the carbonated beverages immediately explode into fizzy clouds because of explosive decompression, and then immediately freeze into tinkly sparkly masses of ice crystals because of the incredibly low surface temperature. Nobody drinks cola ON Europa, it is only consumed deep BELOW the surface ice in our high pressure submarine cities.

Take a look at this

And absolutely no one would notice small pill-like things in their ice cubes. Uh-huh.

Take a look at this

Posters 1-3:
I'll be expecting your experimental results soon testing your hypothesis.

Take a look at this

@Sednaboo#19
Done. Soda poured over ice didn't fizz at all with the addition of mints that worked on soda in a can (that was a mess :D ). There was little carbonation left.

Take a look at this
#24 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 8:53 AM

Fine you know what freeze a alkaselzer and get em that way.

Take a look at this
#25 posted by Cadfael, June 4, 2009 9:08 AM

@ #8-9

These would be valid arguments if the mythbusters were at all scientific in any of their tests. I hesitate to call them experiments, as they're not.

In the interest of full disclosure: I have not seen this particular mentos mythbusters episode. I have however seen quite a few others.

Entertaining and enlightening the mythbusters are. They are not, however, scientific. So please refrain from suggesting their studies are fact.

Take a look at this
#26 posted by Takuan, June 4, 2009 9:30 AM

the correct method is to split the Mentos and insert a seed of sodium metal. In this way, you can be assured a successful fizz event as well as a good blinding and scarring.

Take a look at this
#27 posted by dainel, June 4, 2009 9:36 AM

How to not melt the mentos in water.

Use those half-sphere ice cube molds. When frozen, you can join them together into spheres. Just use a bit of water to wet the surface, and put back in the freezer. But before that, make holes in the center. Something hot will do, like a heated spoon, or ball bearing. Put the mentos in the center before you join the ice into spheres. You crush it first. Maybe powder will react faster.

But it probably still wouldn't work.

Take a look at this

@ #21

Your ability to discern the scientific content and rigor of a television episode you have not watched is astonishing. Are you available to meet with Mister James Randi to demonstrate this supernatural ability?

Take a look at this

@ #10: Yeah, hah ha, roofies are just hilarious! I get it, date rape! /S

Jerk.

Take a look at this

Oh, sorry- I meant 'a$$hole'. ;)

Take a look at this
#33 posted by Takuan, June 4, 2009 10:59 AM

mmmm...cesium...

Take a look at this
#34 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 10:59 AM

The joke would be on you when nobody comes to your next party ... and that would be just for serving diet coke.

Take a look at this
#35 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 11:40 AM

It sounds to me like no one has followed the instructions on the link and actually done it. Science isn't just emotional, reactionary hunches, folks.

Take a look at this

@Chairboy (30) - he meant he hadn't seen that particular episode. But, unlike the Mythbusters, he probably has more than one data point with which to conclude they aren't scientific. They're entertainers that do neat projects, but not scientists and certainly not rigorous experimenters.

Take a look at this
#37 posted by Cadfael, June 4, 2009 1:40 PM

I love the mythbusters. I think they're great. I don't think they're scientists or that their rigorous "confirmed or busted" routine actually means confirmed or busted.

Snarky rundown of every mythbusters episode:

1) what is the myth?
2) how can we bust or confirm "myth"
3) "experiment" decided from above
4) did anything blow up?
yes: confirmed
no: move to step 5
5) increase firepower
6) did it blow up?
yes: confirmed
no: repeat step 5

Take a look at this

> Mythbusters. They're entertainers that do neat
> projects, but not scientists and certainly not
> rigorous experimenters.

I strongly, strongly agree.

They're very definitely not amateur scientists. They try hard to *appear* scientific, but they don't "get it." The show would be vastly improved if they had people with science background, even if off camera. (Maybe they do have these people. If so, then they're not listening to them enough.)

Take a look at this

Surface roughness of the candy is not the issue, since the effect is caused by air pockets trapped in the rough spots. If the roughness traps little air, then there's little effervescence.

Since the above simple idea is lost on the various teams analyzing this (mythbusters, newscientist), I wouldn't trust their pronouncements much.

ALso: solidified sugar is transparent, while mentos' coating is opaque white, suggesting that perhaps vast numbers of microbubbles are embedded in that surface. (That's why taffy is white, no? Entrained bubbles?) If dissolving sugar surface exposes microbubbles, then the major part of the effect is explained. If so, then "roughness" is no explanation at all ...and most important, a carefully-polished mentos candy would still provoke the explosion.

Take a look at this

MUST TRY THIS!!! Blowtorch a mentos just a tiny bit, then inspect microscopically to assure that the melted sugar surface has become smooth.

If this doesn't reduce the explosion effect, then the surface explanation being used by everyone ...is just plain wrong.

Take a look at this
#41 posted by foible, June 4, 2009 2:27 PM

Okay cadfael,dculbertson, and Bill Beaty, why don't we let XKCD explain why mythbusters are all about science.

http://xkcd.com/397/

Take a look at this

I'm with Anonymous @ #35. Somebody should actually try this to see if it works before everybody continues screaming at each other about why it is or isn't a plausible prank.

I'd do it, but I don't like diet cola.

Take a look at this

"I'd do it, but I don't like diet cola."

You're prob'ly not gonna wanna drink it when you're done..

Take a look at this

Actually I don't like Mentos either. Or cleaning up liquid spills, for that matter. So all in all it would be kind of like a Muslim doing an experiment as to whether bacon really can be used to cure hangovers.

Take a look at this
#45 posted by Anonymous, June 4, 2009 2:43 PM
It sounds to me like no one has followed the instructions on the link and actually done it. Science isn't just emotional, reactionary hunches, folks.
Oh, again with the MythBusters bashing!

Can't you leave them alone? They never did anything to you!

Take a look at this

> http://xkcd.com/397/

Lol, this ongoing flaw in Mythbusters, drawing continuing criticism ...has itself become a pop-culture phenomenon!

Trouble is, it would be SO SO SO simple for them to end the criticism by solving it. Just get one single freaking postdoc in as a consultant. Millions of us would volunteer to do it for free! But noooooooooo.

The problem has become bad enough that XKCD has to step in and try to turn around the scientific community that mythbusters alienates.

Instead, why wouldn't they fix the actual problem? Are they convinced that scientists are a micro demographic not worth bothering about? Or are we all supposed to be boring nerds who'd ruin their show if we had any input?

Just think what power mythbusters would have in our culture if it WAS actually trustworthy, and if it WASN'T the butt of scientists jokes?

Take a look at this

So, if Isaac Newton doesn't have a PhD, gravity isn't real? Interesting when science is legitimate because it's proclaimed by people with letters after their names rather than by being proved experimentally. That sounds so much more like religion than science.

Take a look at this
#48 posted by Cadfael, June 4, 2009 6:33 PM

@ 47 Aninous

Wait. What?

Take a look at this

I'm just saying that giving credence to a conclusion because of the credentials of the proponent is appropriate to religion or philosophy, and giving credence to a conclusion because of the methodology is appropriate to science.

Take a look at this
#50 posted by Anonymous, June 5, 2009 1:53 AM

Actually, what works REALLY well are those little spicy heart candies you get at valentines day. Someone dropped a few of this in a pop (not diet coke), and it was quite impressive.

They would also freeze in an icecube much better!

Take a look at this
#51 posted by Anonymous, June 5, 2009 6:03 AM

Not too much science to this Mythbusters episode -- they bought a bunch of different kind of soda, dropped a few Mentos into each one, and showed which ones fizzed the most.

Doesn't take rocket science for that one -- all you had to do was watch...it was really amazing how much more the Diet Coke fizzed than everything else.

And I'm right there with XKCD -- it's the fact that they get somebody to THINK about something that makes them all so awesome.

And they blow stuff up.

Take a look at this
#52 posted by Anonymous, June 5, 2009 6:01 PM

I don't know if it will work of not, but nothing with any cola is a "Manhattan."

Take a look at this
#53 posted by Anonymous, June 12, 2009 6:06 AM

Just tried the ice freezing technique. Trickier than expected. I tried layering it into two sections as suggested. First I froze the bottom layer of ice, next I placed the mento on the frozen bottom section and added water to the remainder. At that moment, the ice on the bottom melted enough to loosen from the base, floating to the top and kicking the mento to the bottom. I ignored this in the hopes that something magical would happen overnight. It did not. The mentos were at the bottom of all the ice cubes, and had diminished in size significantly. If it had worked, I believe it would have been impossible to see the mento through the ice, the center was pretty white just from the frozen water. However, I do question whether or nor it would work if the mento is dissolved by the amount I noticed. I have always heard that it was the exterior shell that reacted with the diet coke. In addition, the mento needs to be 100% surrounded by ice in order for the timed release to occur. If anyone has any suggestions, I'm all for it. Will continue to attempt other methods. Due to the requirements necessary for making this a reality vs the simplistic way it is presented in the instructions, I declare this recipe a hoax.

Leave a comment

Name:
Anonymous