This part of the "Terms and Conditions" killed it for me-
You agree not to submit images which violate our content restrictions. Restricted content includes anything obscene, offensive, blasphemous, pornographic, deceptive, threatening, menacing, abusive, harmful, an invasion of privacy, supportive of unlawful action, defamitory, libelous, vulgar, violent or otherwise objectionable.
rules on submitting photos: you must have the rights to reproduce the image you provide. Generally, if it is a photo you have taken, this will be the case. However, if it is a photo taken by a photographer or one that has been published you will need to include a release. We do not accept images of copyrighted material without a release. Neither do we accept images considered to be obscene, vulgar, hateful, an invasion of privacy, or otherwise objectionable.
1)Am I to believe that someone who took an underwater photo of an elephant swimming submitted it to be made into a shower curtain?
2) WTF kind of photos were they getting for a shower curtain that constituted an "invasion of privacy"?
Too bad about the rights to the image. Perhaps they could provide a licensed library too? I'd go all in for one of "The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife".. Just odd like that.
We do not accept images of copyrighted material without a release.
Good luck operating a sustainable business with that albatross around your neck. I wonder how far into the red they'll go before they compromise that particular "business ethic".
I'm going to submit a photo of my empty shower. That or take a photo depicting what you would see if there was a window in my shower facing in to my yard.
Kurt Vonnegut wrote a story about a similar product-- a movie star wanted a picture of her body sandblasted onto a shower door. As I recall it, for some reason the actress rejected the door and he ended up installing it in his own bathroom.
I had an idea like this a few years ago using that shower curtain with little slots you could put photos in.. Get all your friends together and take a pictured of them with their hands over their eyes.. and maybe 2 or 3 peeking between their fingers.
at long last... the perfect format for LOBSTER KNIFE FIGHT
http://pictureisunrelated.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wtf_pics-lobster-knife-figh.jpg
if you mock them, you have to let them go.
http://www.gampoabbey.org/life/lobster-release.htm
My father's friend had the Psycho shower curtain.....
great idea!
How is it possible that they don't feature a picture of someone showering?
Take your pick...
Psycho Shower Curtain
http://www.prankplace.com/psychoshowercurtain.htm
Bloody Shower Curtain
http://www.spinninghat.com/product/blood-bath-shower-curtain
Anonymous @7, Yeah, but those are kinda lame.
This part of the "Terms and Conditions" killed it for me-
You agree not to submit images which violate our content restrictions. Restricted content includes anything obscene, offensive, blasphemous, pornographic, deceptive, threatening, menacing, abusive, harmful, an invasion of privacy, supportive of unlawful action, defamitory, libelous, vulgar, violent or otherwise objectionable.
Kill joys.
rules on submitting photos:
you must have the rights to reproduce the image you provide. Generally, if it is a photo you have taken, this will be the case. However, if it is a photo taken by a photographer or one that has been published you will need to include a release. We do not accept images of copyrighted material without a release. Neither do we accept images considered to be obscene, vulgar, hateful, an invasion of privacy, or otherwise objectionable.
1)Am I to believe that someone who took an underwater photo of an elephant swimming submitted it to be made into a shower curtain?
2) WTF kind of photos were they getting for a shower curtain that constituted an "invasion of privacy"?
My face, on the body of David Crosby.
That way, when I get out, she's not so disappointed.
d8^)
Too bad about the rights to the image. Perhaps they could provide a licensed library too? I'd go all in for one of "The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife".. Just odd like that.
Perhaps it's Steve Bloom's shower curtain.
Good luck operating a sustainable business with that albatross around your neck. I wonder how far into the red they'll go before they compromise that particular "business ethic".
Zuzu's just mad because they rejected his Barbarella photo. Give it time, Zooie.
Neat idea but at $200 I'm afraid my cityscape will have to wait.
I'm going to submit a photo of my empty shower. That or take a photo depicting what you would see if there was a window in my shower facing in to my yard.
Kurt Vonnegut wrote a story about a similar product-- a movie star wanted a picture of her body sandblasted onto a shower door. As I recall it, for some reason the actress rejected the door and he ended up installing it in his own bathroom.
"Restricted content includes anything...pornographic"
Epic FAIL.
I had an idea like this a few years ago using that shower curtain with little slots you could put photos in.. Get all your friends together and take a pictured of them with their hands over their eyes.. and maybe 2 or 3 peeking between their fingers.
This would just be a bigger more awesome version