Over on Boing Boing Gadgets, our Rob has the news that the always-retrograde Authors' Guild believes that Amazon is violating copyright law by shipping a device that can read text-files aloud using text-to-speech, because "that's an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law."
The Author's Guild also thinks used books are a form of theft, and that books shouldn't show up in a search-engine result unless the search engine pays for the privilege.
Kindle 2's flagship feature is the reading of text out loud, in the same way as software that's already built into desktop computers and Prof. Stephen Hawking's famous voice box. This has caused a "stir." Paul Aiken, executive director of the Author's Guild, told the Wall Street Journal that you have no right to use this feature. It's a free audiobook, see.
"They don't have the right to read a book out loud," said Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild. "That's an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law."
An Amazon spokesman noted the text-reading feature depends on text-to-speech technology, and that listeners won't confuse it with the audiobook experience. Amazon owns Audible, a leading audiobook provider.
Forget for a moment that text-to-speech doesn't copy an existing work. And forget the odd notion that the artificial enunciation of plain text is equivalent to a person's nuanced and emotive reading. The Guild's claim is that even to read out loud is a production akin to an illegal copy, or a public performance.
If a machine reading a book creates a derivative work, why not a person reading a book?
Ideas grow to fill the containers they imply, and the problem with bad ideas is that their containers are leaky and misshapen. Even if you firmly believe in broad copyright laws, intellectual property is a bad idea because it recasts a legal device as its own philosophical justification. This journey from the utilitarian to the exalted creates a sublime monster that can't help but govern not only the duplication of things, but every aspect of their expression and the culture that makes them meaningful.
Author's Guild claims text-to-speech software is illegal
Discuss this on Boing Boing Gadgets)
- Authors' Guild v Google: opt-out is evil, except when we do it …
- Xeni op-ed on Authors Guild lawsuit against Google Print – Boing Boing
- Authors Guild sues Google — Xeni on NPR (UPDATE) – Boing Boing
- Tell the Authors Guild what you think of used books – Boing Boing
- Writers, publishers and board members of Authors Guide speak out …
- Copyright scholars and publishers on crazy auctorial theories …
