Star Trek cast and the real Enterprise

 Images Nasa50 520 50 On08
Smithsonian's Air & Space Magazine posted their picks for the 50 most memorable images from NASA's half-century history. Of course, this list will ignite debate like rocket fuel on a campfire, but I got a special kick out of the image above. From the Air & Space caption:
Shuttle Enterprise with cast of Star Trek, 1976 NASA’s prototype space shuttle was to have been named Constitution, but fans of the Star Trek TV show mounted a write-in campaign that led to it being named Enterprise. Here the show’s cast (minus William Shatner) poses with the test craft.
Top 50 NASA Photos of All Time

Discussion

Take a look at this

Yes, people really did dress like this in the 70's. ::sigh::

Take a look at this

I'm having a Life on Mars moment.

Take a look at this

What's the story behind Shatner not being present?

Take a look at this

CINEMAJAY @3, because you know there must be one. ; )

Take a look at this

That's a cool set of pictures, but I just can't consider a list like this complete without "A Pale Blue Dot".

Man, I sniffly just thinking about it.

Take a look at this

A friend of mine is a private pilot here in DC. He landed at Dulles airport one day and was taxiing around in his little Cessna, when he came up upon this shuttle!! It was parked there for years, waiting for the Udvar Hazy expansion of the National Air and Space Museum, where it resides today. I remember in high school seeing this fly in -- is was on the back of a giant jet, and they flew it over washington metro area a couple of times so everyone could see it.

http://www.nasm.si.edu/UdvarHazy/

Take a look at this

I love the stylin' suits with the giant shirt collars outside the jacket. You can't keep a collar that big held down!

From what I understand from hearing George Takei, Shatner NEVER shows up to anything he's invited to then bitches about not being invited.

Take a look at this

He's lost without Spock... er Nimoy as his assistant.

Take a look at this
#10 posted by Keir , October 27, 2008 9:52 AM

@8 - beat me to it!

Take a look at this

It's a damn shame the one named Enterprise never flew a live mission.

Take a look at this
#12 posted by Alan , October 27, 2008 9:57 AM

I remember my c. 1976 suit as a kid; kelly green, with a light green shirt with the collar out. Since the shirt sleeves were way too long, I also turned them up over the sleeve of the coat. I was stylin'!

Take a look at this

So, where can I get a print of this?

Take a look at this

Enterprise challenge quiz: how many vessels can you list that bore the name? (fictional and historic)

Take a look at this

Head's up... the photo links to the Clark Ashton Smith stuff on Amazon by accident.

Take a look at this
#16 posted by OM Author Profile Page, October 27, 2008 10:21 AM

...The Shat never showed up to a *LOT* of these promo ops. Chalk it up to his ego combined with his not getting paid for the appearance. He didn't even show up for Gene's funeral.

Take a look at this

Why is Walter Koenig so pale?

Take a look at this

COWICIDE @15, thanks, fixed!

Take a look at this

It's fun to see images of the beginning of the shuttle program when it's so near its end.

Take a look at this

Man, George Takei looks the least gay of all of them.

Take a look at this

> #17 - Why is Walter Koenig so pale?

Just back from a long space mission and the space craft's tanning booth was on the fritz.

Take a look at this

Doesn't this Enterprise appear in one of the Star Trek movies? I think Kirk has a model of it in a glass case?

This creates a strange loop, where the real Enterprise is named for the fictional Enterprise, which is fictionally named for the real Enterprise.

Whoa!

Take a look at this

Is it possible that Shatner wasn't there because he was getting acting gigs?

Take a look at this
#24 posted by Anonymous , October 27, 2008 10:54 AM

#20 How can you make such an intollerent statement? I mean look at those wingtips that he's wearing. Finely tuned gaydar ALWAYS scopes out the shoes, man.

Take a look at this
#25 posted by Anonymous , October 27, 2008 11:06 AM

Shatner never did much Trekkie spots like this because he honestly didn't like be associated with the Trekkie crowd. He didn't enjoy being type-cast.

This is why he didn't do other sci-fi ventures, and why he wanted more "actiony" contemporary roles like "TJ Hooker" ect.

He also liked being paid for spots like this. Most of the cast did freebie stuff - conventions, autographs, ect. Shatner though he was better, and was the real star/ego of the show.


Take a look at this
#26 posted by mdh , October 27, 2008 12:37 PM

Wow,

"it's been a long road, getting from there to here"

Take a look at this

deforest kelley dressed quite fly.

Take a look at this
Yes, people really did dress like this in the 70's. ::sigh::

Sadly, people don't dress half as well anymore. Tattered jeans, over-sized clothes, ugly shoes, casual wear that people shouldn't be wearing outside their work, leave alone work etc.

Hell, I see a good number of pocket squares in that picture. It makes me weep to see even bums of the 1930s dressed in better style than the millionaires of our day.

Take a look at this

DeForest Kelley seems to be wearing exactly what he was wearing when he made his bearded entrance in Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

Take a look at this

Takuan@14:

Enterprise challenge quiz: how many vessels can you list that bore the name? (fictional and historic)

Do you mean how many wessels? Including nuclear wessels?

Virgin Galactic seems to be planning to name their first spaceship Enterprise.

Take a look at this

@#13: I think all NASA photography is in the public domain, so find a high-res version somewhere (e.g. ask NASA PR) and print away. (Model-release laws still prevent you from using images in ads, i.e. implying that people recognizable in the photo (or NASA itself) endorse the thing being advertised. But other than that, go nuts).

@#23: Yeah right. Recording weird covers of Elton John, more likely.

Take a look at this

@#20 MRFantasy

L... O... L.

Take a look at this

Be sure to photoshop T.J. Hooker in.

Take a look at this

@ #14:

I'm gonna say 11.

Take a look at this

They go to 11?

Take a look at this

Lessie...there was the original non-fiction enterprise, the one named after the fictional Enterprise, that's two...and then the NX-01, the NCC-1701, the NCC 1701-A in Star Trek 5, the 1701B, C, and D, The FUTURE 1701 D, the E, the J...

And then there was that episode in the Next Generstion where the spacetime continuum tore up and all the enterprises from parallel universes were all in the same placer together. So, I guess the real answer is INFINITY.

...I'm not sure, but I think I may be the geekiest person alive.

Take a look at this

FOURFIVEFIRE: I was just making a Spinal Tap reference, but to join you in total geekdom,(adjusts pocket protector) remember that in the show Enterprise, Capt. Archer had three examples of ships that had previously born the name on his wall, the 2nd of which was the aircraft carrier you mentioned, the third was the space shuttle (above) you also accounted for, but the first was a clipper ship, I believe, so that makes at least 12 then. I'm willing to provide for at least one unaccounted for, to make a nice round 13. =D

Take a look at this

And when you think about it, there must have been an F, G, H, and I Enterprise between E and J, which were never shown. So that makes at least 16 that we know of. 17 if you count the one I threw in for good measure. =D

Take a look at this

Mah geek cred is shot! I bow down to the master!

Take a look at this

Something tells me TAKUAN has us both beat. ;D

Take a look at this

A funny Classic Trek re-edit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luVjkTEIoJc
Worth spreading, IMO.

Post a comment

Anonymous