Interoperability and the DMCA: comprehensive look at problems, some good solutions

Aaron Perzanowski sez, "This article looks at the ways in which the DMCA's anticircumvention provisions interfere with interoperability. It argues that the obstacles the DMCA creates to the development, distribution, and use of interoperable devices and services is at odds with the ways in which IP law has traditionally regulated interoperability. This results in strong patent-like rights over DRM-restricted platforms. The paper then considers whether antitrust law can be used to correct the DMCA's shortcomings. In the end, I suggest that section 1201(f) needs to be rewritten to accommodate data interoperability. This paper is in some respects a follow on piece to an earlier article, The Magnificence of the Disaster: Reconstructing the Sony BMG Rootkit Incident, which you were kind enough to feature here on Boing Boing."
Congress enacted the DMCA to enable thriving online markets for copyrighted works by providing rights holders with tools to guard against unauthorized access and widespread infringement. Despite Congress’s efforts, the DMCA also gave rise to broad powers over playback and distribution technologies that interfere with IP’s longstanding tolerance of unauthorized unilateral interoperability. Ironically, this control over interoperability could hamper the further development of the very markets the DMCA was meant to foster. Likewise, restrictions on interoperability conflict with copyright’s ultimate purpose—the dissemination and use of cultural works in the progress of science—by preventing authorized purchasers of copyrighted material from making use of those works.

Antitrust offers at best an imperfect means of redressing the DMCA’s impact on interoperability. Not all interference with interoperability gives rise to cognizable competitive harms. And the deference antitrust shows towards legitimately acquired IP rights requires rights holders to exceed the scope of their statutory grants before facing antitrust liability.

This is a great, comprehensive paper -- a really engaging history of the interop problems that have arisen in the ten years since the DMCA, and some good, simple reccos for fixing this stuff. If I have one complaint, it's this: the article fails to look at the moral, "maker" case for interoperability, that fundamental right to re-use and re-imagine your property as you see fit. There's a dignity in being able to control your environment that our minds deeply crave, and rules that prevent us from reconfiguring our tools strike at that dignity.

(Thanks, Aaron!)


Discussion

Take a look at this

"Ironically, this control over interoperability could hamper the further development of the very markets the DMCA was meant to foster."

Insightful idea, and probably one of the most effective arguments with which to persuade lawmakers who may heretofore have been less than amenable to DMCA reform.

A similar idea applies to the financial market regulation. The financial market argued in favor of deregulation, but the lax regulation was one of the driving forces of our (and their) current woes.

Take a look at this
DMCA reform.
Is that code for repeal the DMCA?
A similar idea applies to the financial market regulation. The financial market argued in favor of deregulation, but the lax regulation was one of the driving forces of our (and their) current woes.
What the hell are you talking about? How is the DMCA in any way like deregulation? In fact, it's the opposite. However, this is a familiar problem:
The paper then considers whether antitrust law can be used to correct the DMCA's shortcomings.
It's proposed that more laws are needed to correct the failings of previous laws. This is very much like the fiscal clusterfuck currently in the headlines. Central banking shit itself, so now the central banks want more authority to "fix" the mess they themselves created? (Just like the Republican suggestion to elect McCain to clean up Bush's quagmire.)

Just repeal the original offending law! Abolish the DMCA.

Take a look at this

Is there a link available to the paper? Or at least a reference to its publication somewhere?

Take a look at this

Kabur Naj @3: The 'thanks' link at the end takes you to the SSRN page for the article, from where you can download it as a PDF.

Take a look at this

Thanks. Got it.

Post a comment

Anonymous