Converse designed by UPSO

 Images Portfolio Converse Out
A bunch of artists designed Chuck Taylor sneakers this season for the CONVERSE (PRODUCT) RED line, including my pal Dustin "UPSO" Hostetler. I dig the color scheme and of course UPSO's artwork on the upper. Sharp! They're $49.99 with 10 percent of the wholesale price going to The Global Fund to Fight AIDS. Click "Converse 1Hund(red)" on UPSO's site or search for "Project Product Red" on converse.com's online shop to see the whole line. UPSO (UPSO.org)

Discussion

Take a look at this

Nice shoe...

having grown up in the era when wearing converse shoes wasn't only an option, it was, really, the ONLY option... these are nifty..

I like the fact that they are donating 10% to fighting aids...

however, Converse is owned by Nike, which has a reputation for using sweatshop labor...

Does anyone have any information as to where these are made and the conditions of the factories?

Take a look at this

I believe they should reissue Weird Al's 1980s purple-orange-green Chucks. Who's with me?

Take a look at this

@#1 POSTED BY BONDJAMESBOND

however, Converse is owned by Nike, which has a reputation for using sweatshop labor...

Not too sure about the sweatshop labor, but will say this: In the past year I've owned two pairs of Converse Jack Purcell sneakers and the quality of their product is nowhere near the pre-Nike days.

Yes, Converse sneakers are supposed to fall apart and degrade. But that was always the uppers. The soles and insoles of the Nike made Converses are horrid and fall apart before the uppers. So they are truly useless at that point.

Not to mention the cotton used in the material for the uppers nowadays are not stiff like in the pre-Nike days. They are soft out of the box and just don't feel right.

I'm all for helping fight AIDS, but you know what? For $49.99 I'd rather just take that $49.99 and donate 100% of it to a charity and buy a better quality sneaker.

Take a look at this

As soon as I saw this I also thought to comment on Nike buying up Converse. Quality, persistence of some really excellent styles and the lasts the shoes are made on have all changed for the worst. I used to be only able to wear Converse because the skate styles were completely flat, now they have raised heel type insoles, which are no good for me. I think the manufacturer changed when Nike took over but it would require a hidden camera, investigative journo to uncover where they're made now and buy whom.

Take a look at this

"...search for "Project Red" on converse.com..."

That should probably read Product Red, as Project Red returns no results using the site search at Converse.

Take a look at this

I didn't realize how much chucks are these days. The last pair I owned was in 1989-90. And back then, I remember going to any random discount store back than and finding a pair for $20. The regular canvas black and white chucks go for $40 now. If i'm going to pay that much for a shoe I might well just get a $100 pair that is 50% that are easy to find everywhere.

Take a look at this

Hmm, that design is kind of reminiscent of this Upset the System shirt that came out a while back.

Take a look at this

wow, I can not believe how bad the converse.com website is. By the time I finally find the project red 100 shoes, I still don't get to see a bunch of shoe designs at once. You only get crappy little photos one at a time.

Take a look at this

RED: For African kids, made by Vietnamese kids.

Take a look at this

In the past year I've owned two pairs of Converse Jack Purcell sneakers and the quality of their product is nowhere near the pre-Nike days.

This is true, apparently since the early 90s.

Take a look at this

Jack (#3):

I think Jack Purcellss are supposed to be "softer" than your average Chucks. That said, I own a pair of Jack Purcells from which a couple of eyelets dettached from the fabric just a couple of months into wearing them, which is unacceptable for any shoe. That's just shoddy craftsmanship.

Take a look at this

STEINY @5, You're absolutely correct. Thank you!

Take a look at this

@#11 POSTED BY MITTZNZ:

I think Jack Purcellss are supposed to be "softer" than your average Chucks.

Not really. I've owned pairs before in the late 1980s and early 1990s and they were stiffer and required as much breaking in as the Chucks.

I'm investing in Asics & Puma from now on.

Don't even get me started on New Balance quality nowadays. They are just as bad as Converse nowadays.

Take a look at this

#14 - I love PF Flyers! More comfortable than Converse, any day of the week. And less ubiquitous.

Take a look at this

These shoes are cute and all, but why are there no posts about David Foster Wallace's death by suicide on Friday? It's been 2 days, isn't he worthy of a post? I submitted a link suggestion and I have no idea of what else to do about getting this noticed other than to reply off-topic here. Though, I think it is a bit on topic since this boingboing entry was posted at about the time that news of his death was spreading.

Take a look at this

a post about DFW would glorify suicide.

my last pair of Converse were made in China, and now that they sell them in Target, you can sure you are supporting evil manufacturing. so support evil to fight a disease that can be stopped with edumacation.

similarly, the once Made in England Doc Martens of the 90s are now as sweatshop free as Levi's.

Post a comment

Anonymous