Mystery bone photos at Treehugger

200806251423.jpg

Alan says: "So my wife and I were hiking at Multnomah Falls on the AK-Wanee trail...it is a 2 mile hike that is definitely the "less travelled." During the hike we came across this set of bones that looks like it was laid out. Couldn't find a skull. I was wondering if anyone had an idea of what type of animal this might be? This area of the hike is pretty steep either direction off the path, so wondering what animal might inhabit or wander these hills?" Photos of mystery bones


Discussion

Take a look at this
#1 posted by Takuan , June 25, 2008 2:33 PM

deer

Take a look at this

its a 'squatch!

Take a look at this
#3 posted by Maurik , June 25, 2008 2:39 PM

As you can tell by the femur it's obviously human.

(facetious)

Take a look at this

I agree with Takuan. Those vertebrae make me think deer, too.

Take a look at this
#5 posted by Burns! , June 25, 2008 2:46 PM

Bigfoot. Duh!

Take a look at this

Bounced it off a rather knowledgeable friend of mine (the link, not the skeleton)... she says "White tailed deer, the hip bones give it away."

Take a look at this

It's a fricking narwhal, natch.
I can't believe we are still discussing this!

Take a look at this

I came across a skeleton recently. I'm thinking it was an opossum. I'm sure a mammologist could easily identify it by the pelvis or teeth.

Take a look at this

not human. the pelvis is not a human pelvis. maybe it's unicorn.

Take a look at this
#10 posted by Hans , June 25, 2008 2:59 PM

Wow a chance to apply my zooarchaeological training!

My conclusions: (i) It is an artiodactyl, and (ii) someone may have deliberately arranged the bones.

Most of the bones need a much more detailed image to be identifiable (other than maybe "terrestrial mammal"). However the bone which is partially obscured by the rock is a metapodial of an artiodactyl (the last image on the link is clearer).

There are notably many bones missing. There are no femurs, humeri, radii, or ulnas, and only half of the innominate. In addition, most of the verts, most of the metapodials, one of the tibias and phalanges are missing.

The arrangement is very curious; the arrangement is roughly anatomical, however the scapulas are both facing the wrong way (heads in), the verts are unarticulated but in a line. My best guess is that scavengers carried off parts of this fellow, and then someone came along and arranged the bones. I would not have expected the degree of arrangement found here if the animal had been scavenged.

Take a look at this

Probably a mule or black-tailed deer. I don't think you'll find whitetails in Oregon.

Take a look at this

Based on Takuan, Arcadian, and The Life Of Bryan, I'd say that police need to be on the lookout for an antelope in the area, known to be an accomplice of the victim ("play" was apparently just a setup).

Take a look at this

Mule DEER that is.

Take a look at this
#14 posted by Dan Author Profile Page, June 25, 2008 3:06 PM

Polar bear?

Take a look at this
#15 posted by Sam Author Profile Page, June 25, 2008 3:14 PM

Jackalope!

Take a look at this
#18 posted by Hans , June 25, 2008 3:19 PM

Minor correction to my post; there is one ulna visible (upper right, beneath the scapula).

Take a look at this

I for one welcome our new skeleton overlyeah whatever. Will this day ever END?

Take a look at this

Perhaps you remember the human skull found near m.falls just over a year ago:
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may152007/skull_found_51407.php

Take a look at this
#21 posted by Fnarf , June 25, 2008 4:11 PM

OK, Alan, where's this "wife" you claim you had with you before you "found" the bones?

Take a look at this
#22 posted by noen , June 25, 2008 4:19 PM

It are photoshopped. I can tell by the pixels.

Take a look at this

Every white tailed deer that I've seen had a head.

Take a look at this

#23: Coyotes steal the skulls to decorate their dens.

Take a look at this

Its DB Cooper!

Take a look at this

I've seen this before. It's a two-headed sasquatch that is usually found only in the remote regions of the Himalayas. they are migratory and they don't have any heads... just like this skeleton! Don't ask me why they are called "two-headed" when they don't have heads. They just are!

Take a look at this

If these bones were on LOST you'd have at least a hundred responses, 99% of which would involve time travel.

With that said, I'm jumping on board with Dan and saying Polar Bear.

Take a look at this

Maybe a hunter got tired/lazy and cut down his kill so he had less to carry? The limbs would be the meatier portions of the carcass, and the head would be saved as a trophy?

Take a look at this
#31 posted by ST , June 25, 2008 5:48 PM

In my experience whenever mysterious bones are found in the woods they are almost always either the remains of a previously unknown to science form of life (often a Big Foot but sometimes a run of the mill Chupacabra) or they are the remains of a person who disappeared under circumstances most mysterious and foul.

Whatever the case there's no way it's a deer. I mean, come on... let's be realistic here.

Take a look at this

let's be realistic here.

majikal thinking. ur doing it rong.

Take a look at this
#33 posted by Takuan , June 25, 2008 5:57 PM

magic deer

Take a look at this

Clearly Skuzzlebut
That rock is obscuring Patrick Duffy's head.

Take a look at this

Swamp gas?

Oh no that's me.

Sorry.

Take a look at this

this can haz Blair Witch write all over it

Take a look at this

Scapulae and hip bones indicate cervid ungulate.

Its some kind of deer.

Take a look at this

Alas! Poor Yorrick. I knew him, Horatio.

Take a look at this

Ohhh, so that's where I left the body...

Take a look at this
#45 posted by Takuan , June 26, 2008 9:07 AM

so what did you do with the head?

Post a comment

Anonymous