Zeppelin moored to gigantic steamer with buzzing biplanes

From the April, 1923 ish of Popular Science, a ZOMG-worthy proposal to moor stately airships to the masts of titanic, biplane-sporting steamships on transoceanic journeys as a means of preparing for the next Great War.

CONVINCED that battle fleets of the future will require the aid of rigid airships as long range scouts, aeronautic experts recently have suggested an ingenious method of mooring rigids to the mast of a moving depot ship at sea, as pictured above.

The depot ship, preferably a converted cruiser, has a hangar forward for small fighting planes, with a launching deck from which the planes are seen taking off to protect the rigid as it returns from a trip.

Topping a raised tripod mast is a mooring device to which the airship is anchored, while projecting from each side of the vessel are other tripods carrying guide ropes that hold the airship’s bow in position as its nose cone is hauled down to the mooring device.

Link

Discussion

Take a look at this

That sooo needs to be steampunked. You could write an entire script from that one image. Well someone could.

Take a look at this

What's to keep the ship from capsizing if there's a big gust of wind?

This just has "bad idea" written all over it, as cool as it may look on paper.

Take a look at this

It wouldn't have been a steamship, not in 1923. The world's navies had been switching over to oil engines for some time before that.

Take a look at this

How are those biplanes going to land back on the ship?

Take a look at this

#2: Ballast...and how could it capsize with an inflatable dirigible attached at the top?

#3: Hence the idea of it being steampunked

#4: The net. Biplanes flew extremely slow.

Take a look at this

You can't see it in this image, but the biplanes would've had pontoon floats instead of wheels and would land next to the ship to be hoisted aboard via winch.

Take a look at this

I thought the whole point was that airships could cross the ocean faster than ships could.

Take a look at this

Or they would have speed matched the zep, and been lowered down to the ship after it docked.

They didn't have RADAR in '23..hence the need for spotting planes.

Take a look at this

Also, the concept of Naval aviation and air craft carriers were still quite controversial in 1923--this was still the era of the "Battleship Admirals".

The reigning wisdom of the Battleship Admirals was put to bed for good in December of 1941, of course.

Take a look at this

And this idea would later be called an "Aircraft Carrier" - although the high winds at sea would make a dirigible rather impractical. You can't just stow it below decks like a plane or helicopter.

Perhaps that's why they didn't do it -

Take a look at this
#11 posted by eevee , March 18, 2008 7:20 AM

Actually, the US Navy experimented with having the biplanes carried by the dirigible. They would "land" by matching speed and hooking onto a bar lowered from the dirigible.

Take a look at this

Airships have a knack for enhancing photographs by virtue of their presence. This reminds me of some photos I saw a while back of a blimp that had been brought down during an atomic test ... I was able to find the photos online after a quick search:

http://airminded.org/2007/05/06/airship-vs-a-bomb/

Click on the photos for high-res versions.

Take a look at this
#13 posted by Takuan , March 18, 2008 7:29 AM

@12

an amazing image, I'm surprised I haven't seen it before, it could be used to evoke so many things

Take a look at this
#14 posted by kokaku , March 18, 2008 7:44 AM

To followup on Eevee@11's comment

The navy experimented with a trapeze arrangement (pioneered aboard U. S. S. Los Angeles) that caught aircraft in mid-flight, and hauled them into the airships cavernous interior. Navy N2Y and F9C bi-planes, equipped with hooks, were flown into position, snagging the arm suspended below the ships belly. Once in position, the biplane was lifted through an opening in the ships hull.

http://www.military.com/forums/0,15240,163549,00.html

Take a look at this
#16 posted by Robbo Author Profile Page, March 18, 2008 8:35 AM

Oh that is sweet!

I just finished watching Frank Capra's classic 1931 adventure: Dirigible and this is like icing on the cake.

Thanks.

Take a look at this

Wow, I could totally see this as part of the Crimson Skies universe... very cool!

Take a look at this

Pukebazooka @12: Holy cats--check the enlarged versions of the photos and you can see that the blimp's ground crew was out in the open during the tests...ah well, they were only enlisted men.

Take a look at this

It amazes me that they didn't see the writing on the wall with regard to lighter-than-air-vehicles, at least in war. Here we have airships and biplanes side by side-- couldn't they see that the airplane would become preeminent? The zeppelin was just a huge, slow target, and full of gas (and whether that gas was flammable or not was moot-- you can't armor plate the thing, so a few shots and bye-bye gas, hello earth).

Take a look at this

@9: Regarding "the end of the battleship admirals":

There's a Book called "The Sinking of the Prince of Wales and Repulse: The End of the Battleship Era," on Amazon at
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sinking-Prince-Wales-Repulse-Battleship/dp/1844150755

This occurred on Dec. 10, 1941, three days after Pearl Harbor. The went into harms' way without air cover and were sunk by bombers.

Take a look at this
#21 posted by Avram , March 18, 2008 11:09 AM

To keep the ship from capsizing we just need to bolt a submarine to the keel.

Take a look at this

The U.S. Navy really did conduct operations with a mooring mast mounted on the U.S.S. Patoka. The Zeppelins Shenandoah, Los Angeles, and the mighty Akron (which had its own fleet of scout planes, as Eevee described above in comment #11) all moored to the Patoka at various times.

See http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-p/ao9-d.htm for photos.

More pictures here, with details.

Take a look at this

Navy blimps (NOT rigid airships) saw extensive duty during WWII and into the mid-1960's as escorts for naval convoys. They were used primarily as sub spotters. No convoy accompanied by blimps was ever successfully attacked by an enemy submarine.

Take a look at this

Pauldrye: "It wouldn't have been a steamship, not in 1923. The world's navies had been switching over to oil engines for some time before that."

Do steam turbines not count as steamships (serious question, genre)? Oil fired steam warships have been built at least into the 1980's. Nuclear quite recently.

Gas turbines are more popular now.

Take a look at this

The modern steam turbine was first built in 1884, for reference.

Take a look at this
#26 posted by m1k3y Author Profile Page, March 18, 2008 3:22 PM

ZOMG indeed!

like something from a DieselPunk version of Stardust!

Take a look at this

#12 Awesome pictures. I can't wait to make a new desktop when I get home. Thanks.

Post a comment

Anonymous