« a day earlier August 5, 2007
August 6, 2007
a day later » August 7, 2007

Ed "Big Daddy" Roth plastic face

This sharp vintage Revell models display sign depicting Ed "Big Daddy" Roth is up for auction on eBay. Roth of course was an underground artist and hot rodder who helped shape the Kustom Kulture scene in 1960s California. Revell made model kits of Roth's hot rods and cartoon icons like Rat Fink. With a week left in the auction, the current bid is $255. From the auction listing:
 02 I 000 Ag Ef 404F 1This is an ad caricature of Ed Roth for Revell Models. There is a little paint missing on the frame border also a small scratch on the lower left hand corner.There are some small discolorations on his nose, a small scratch underside of the nose and on the hat. This is a great piece of Ed Roth memorabilia to add to your collection. There is a small plaque that is missing on the bottom of the frame, not sure what it said. The sticker says" Revell Authentic Kits". It is a little dirty and could use a cleaning for display.
Link

Previously on BB:
• Ed "Big Daddy" Roth show in Los Angeles Link
 

Jay Kinney reviews Zeitgeist, the Movie

Picture 1-88

For the last couple of months, Boing Boing readers have been emailing me about a two-hour documentary available on Google Video called Zeitgeist, the Movie. I finally got around to viewing it.

In three parts, Zeitgeist (which has no credits) attempts to show that 1) Christianity is rehashed pagan sun-worship and is used by the rich and powerful to control people, 2) the 9/11 tragedies were part of an elite conspiracy, and 3) ever since World War I, the ultra-rich have been secretly manufacturing wars and financial collapses to control the populace and to get richer and more powerful.

I don't know enough about politics, history, or religion to have a valid opinion of Zeitgeist, but I was interested in getting a well-informed person's assessment of the documentary. I could think of no one better suited than Jay Kinney. He was the publisher of the late, great Gnosis Magazine, the author of several books on Western esoteric and occult traditions, and the author of The Masonic Enigma, "a journey of discovery into the real facts (and mysteries) of Masonry's history and symbols." He's also an amazingly talented cartoonist, and contributed to The Whole Earth Review which is how I first learned about him. (His 1987 article, "If Software Companies Ran the Country," where he compares Al Capp's Shmoos to infinitely-copyable software, remains as fresh and powerful today as it did 20 years ago).

At my request, Jay watched the movie, and kindly wrote the following review for Boing Boing:

Zeiting the Geist

The latest bit of guerrilla media to take the online universe by storm is "Zeitgeist, the Movie." Clocking in at close to two hours' length, and with over a million views on Google Video since its June 26th "official" release, Zeitgeist is a grabby, cranky, can't-stop-watching-it documentary that purports to tell the real truth about Christianity, 9/11, and the International Bankers.

Exactly who is behind the video is unclear, although someone with the moniker of "Peter J." has posted an online letter claiming credit and explaining Zeitgeist's message to those who may have somehow failed to grasp the worldview that the video hammers home.

And what is that worldview, pray tell? Religions in general, and Christianity in particular, are primarily systems of social control. 9/11 was an inside job and the destruction of the WTC twin towers and building 7 were aided by controlled demolition. And finally, International Bankers, through the Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), control our money and our future, leading to, ta da, the coming One World Government and the microchipping of everyone.

Exactly how all this fits together is left to the viewer's imagination or, presumably, the film-maker's hash pipe. Are those who manipulate Christianity for control purposes in cahoots with the Bankers, and were the Bankers in on the 9/11 caper? Zeitgeist sidesteps such logical questions through the use of the all-purpose term, "the elite," a shadowy group of rich and powerful men who want nothing more than to enslave humanity and reap block-buster profits through the promotion of wars and financial crises.

For conspiracy buffs, this is all pretty standard fare, and, indeed, aficionados of the genre will find little new in "Zeitgeist." The notions that most religions were originally a kind of solar worship, and that the Jesus Christ story recapitulated the mythos of numerous other "dying gods," were floating around in the late 1700s. Fittingly, the video features a quote from Thomas Paine reducing Christianity to warmed-over sun worship, which was a daring bit of religion-baiting 200 years ago, albeit not so earth-shattering today.

The nefarious International Bankers meme has been propagating itself since at least the mid-1800s and has long been a mainstay of radical right-wing circles where it has often overlapped with mutterings about Jewish cabals.

The 9/11 truth segment of the video is, of course, of much more recent vintage, but, here too, it mostly repeats accusations that have gotten widespread play in the uber-skeptic milieu.

Breaking new factual ground is not what Zeitgeist is about, however. Rather, the video is a powerful and fast-acting dose of agitprop, hawking its conclusions as givens. Unfortunately, like most propaganda, it doesn't play fair with its intended audience. At times, while watching it, I felt like I was getting Malcolm McDowell's treatment in Clockwork Orange: eyes pried wide open while getting bombarded with quick-cut atrocity photos.

At other times, Zeitgeist engages in willful confusion by showing TV screen shots of network or cable news with voice-overs from unidentified people not associated with the news programs. If one weren't paying close attention, the effect would be to confer the status and authority of TV news upon the words being spoken. Even when quotes or sound bites are attributed to a source, there's no way to tell if they are quoted correctly or in context.

Late in the video, there's a supposed quote from David Rockefeller, which, if genuine, would be an astounding confession of complicity in mass manipulation. But, of course, the quote is not sourced or dated, which renders it useless. (The video's website does feature a Sources page, but a hodge-podge list of books, with no page numbers cited, is of little value for source verification.)

The over-all temper of the video is rather like the John Birch Society on acid, with interludes by Harry Smith. Incongruously, after spending nearly two hours trying to scare the bejeezis out of its viewers, Zeitgeist ends on an oddly upbeat note, telling us that Love -- not Fear -- is the answer, We are all One, and featuring sound-bites from Ram Dass and Carl Sagan.

It's a shame, really, that Zeitgeist is, ultimately, such a mess. There are plenty of legitimate questions about what transpired on 9/11, just as there are plenty of shady doings in international finance or puzzling aspects of religious history, for that matter. And what is coming down in the name of National Security is truly unnerving. Yet, bundling them all together in disjointed fashion does justice to none of them. Time and again, Zeitgeist maximizes emotional impact at the expense of a more reasoned weighing of evidence. But, perhaps that's the intention.

I've often pondered about what it might take to snap everyone out of the walking dream we collectively entered on 9/11/01. Just as the fall of the Berlin Wall provided the emotional pivot for the end of the Cold War, only a collective experience of an intensity equal to that of 9/11 might jolt us awake as to what is really happening in the corridors of power and certain undisclosed locations.

It's my hunch that Zeitgeist is one attempt to provide such a jolt, and it does indeed pack a certain punch. Too bad it also runs off in three directions at once, and is so indiscriminate in its sources and overly certain of its conclusions. Zeitgeist may be powerful, but its power is tainted with some simplistic and pernicious memes that have already received more propagation than they deserve. The video's producer does inform us that "It is my hope that people will not take what is said in the film as the truth . . ."

Indeed.

Link to Google Video page | Link to torrent files
 

Chart of presidential candidate's positions

200708061422 Based on this chart that shows the issue positions of 18 presidential candidates, I don't like any of them. My dream candidate would be Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich's love child. Link (Via Laughing Squid)

Reader comment:

Jay says:

I ran across this link today, which by choosing a stance and level of importance towards certain issues, your ideal candidate is automatically returned to you via a points-based system. I believe it was built off of the very same chart you posted earlier today. Who says voting requires personal involvement?

Sam says:
I can't say I did a whole lot of fact checking on every single check and "x" on that whole chart, but I did look at health care, which is an important issue to me, and specifically Mitt Romney, who has a unique take on the subject. I don't know what they mean by Universal health care, but Mitt Romney's system is universal health care, but it's not socialized. Mass. already has it - it's like car insurance - it works within the free market system but has regulations so people aren't getting ripped off. The point is, the chart should be corrected because Romney certinaly advocates universal health care, or is should be corrected to say "socialized health care."

Also, I think Clinton has proven she doesn't have the guts to stick it through (having already been paid off by big medicine), but that's a different subject entirely. I guess this chart just shows what a candidate states rather than trying to decode their true intentions.

Kyle says:
I checked the site's overall results page, and found that Dennis Kucinich has been #1 in people's results more times than every other candidate combined. This got me curious, and so I started looking at the code and the data. The algorithm on the site is quite flawed, and it frightens me that anyone would make their voting decision based on these flawed results.

Kucinich and McCain are the only two candidates for whom answers for each question have been given (many are "unknown" or "other"), and the coder has no normalization technique included to ignore these issues (such as calculating the raw "score" for a candidate and then dividing by the number of issues considered).

Second, for example, the algorith treats a candidate who supports the war and a candidate who supports withdrawal (albeit a phased withdrawal) as equivalent! I would have thought that a candidate who supports phased withdrawal would be treated like a candidate who opposes the war (if I as a visitor to the site supported a phased withdrawal, I would have selected "oppose the war" and not "support the war").

Beyond that, the programmer does not allow the user to select "supports phased withdrawal," so it skews the results even more (and as discussed above, the logical answer the user would choose for "supports phased withdrawal" is the exact opposite of what the programmer thinks it means).

mikew says:
On a whim, I coded the position matrix from your post from a few days ago (support = 1, oppose = -1, Unknown = 0, and grayer responses were -.5 or .5), calculated the distances in 25-space between each candidate, and scaled those distances to one dimension (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multidimensional_scaling). The result is a purely data-driven look at how the candidates fall that just happens to jive with most of our liberal/conservative intuitions (Note: height of leader lines is just for display purposes). Here's the link
 

A surreal and supremely inane compendium of miscellaneous knowledge, Vol 10

200708061206

Archie panel from the Spire Christian Comics era. Link

Picture 6-20Video -- Great commercial for an awful toy from the 1960s called the Swing Wing. It's a beanie with a pendulum. You put on your head and swing it around. I have a dim memory of seeing this on TV when it originally appeared. Link

Picture 8-13 MP3s -- "Hobo Conversations and Interviews - Conversations with Sidedoor Pullman Kid Hop-A-Long Chet Dante and Austin John." Link

Picture 9-10 Video -- shouting match between Bill O'Reilly and Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut. Link

200708061158 The art of Hannes Bok, 1950s science fiction illustrator. Link

200708061211 Polygon Pete uses ZBrush ("(It's like finding a box of infinite Sculpey!!!) ") to made 3-D drawings of Woodring characters. Link

 

Make Halloween special

200708061153
Here's the cover for the MAKE Halloween special, which is loaded with projects that will show you how to create a terrific haunted house, throw a cannibal feast party, and use make-up to turn yourself into a horrific monster. The illustrations on the cover and inside were drawn by the amazing Seth, creator of Palookaville.
Halloween is *the* maker holiday - last year our contest had thousands of entries from around the world and this year we decided Halloween was so important for making we would do a special edition of MAKE.

DIY HALLOWEEN 2007 from the editors of MAKE and CRAFT brings you 40-plus DIY projects for the holiday that's made for makers. From the craftiest costumes to amazing animated props and the latest in computer-controlled haunted house effects, this special issue will include: headless Marie Antoinette costume, mechanical ghosts and ghouls, LED and laser jack-o'-lanterns, creature makeup and blood-spurting wounds, DIY coffins and tombstones, T. Rex rooftopper, flaming LED skulls, kid-tested haunted house tricks, and a special "Ghoulbox" section with Halloween kits, tools, and gadgets. Plus demonic decorations, hideous party snacks, and profiles of extraordinary makers and their creepy crafts.

You can pre-order the special edition of MAKE here @ the Maker store only $9.99!

Link
 

Miles Thompson's upcoming art show

 Cali Images Padreserra
Here's a sample from Miles Thompson's upcoming show at La Luz De Jesus Gallery in Hollywood. Link
 

Interview with street gang researcher

Freakonomics interviewed Sudhir Venkatesh, a professor of sociology at Columbia University about his research into street gang life. He has a book coming out in 2008, called Gang Leader for a Day.
200708061051 Q: How do gang members see themselves as fitting in with society at large? Do gang members have a real comprehension that the things they do — dealing drugs, engaging in violence, destroying property, scaring people — are widely perceived as not only illegal but also morally wrong?

A: Many gang members who attain leadership status are deeply conscious of their perception by wider society. They tend to make two arguments when discussing their behavior: first, that whites also work in the underground economy but are not prosecuted (or stigmatized) to the same degree (just look at the differential rates of punishment for powder cocaine and crack cocaine — the former is distributed by whites to a far greater degree); and second, that corporations also engage in criminal activity, but are rarely viewed as outlaws — not just Enron, but oil and other companies that have established histories of supporting anti-democratic regimes in developing counties to secure their own profits.

Link
 

Interview with a perfumer

Smithsonian interviews Celiné Ellena, a third-generation perfumer at esteemed perfume house Charabot in Grasse, France. From the interview:
Did you have formal training?
Today, young perfumers must study chemistry. I've been creating fragrances for about 14 years. I have a diploma in psychology. It's helpful. Fragrances are very sensuous, sensual. When you talk about fragrance, you talk about the intimate. It's very deep, very personal.

What's an average day?
I think of different fragrances for different customers. When I think of a fragrance, it is like an image that I have in my mind. I have the image of the smell of the fragrance. And then writing the formula is like drawing the image. It's like I'm trying to build a puzzle. In the same day, I could imagine a flower fragrance, a woody, masculine fragrance, something very feminine, while also thinking about scents for shampoos and cosmetics.

Some are easy. An apple shower gel: a few drops of apple. Sometimes I have to take my time, close my door and think about it. I write my formula on the computer, and my assistant mixes it for me in the lab. The smell of the lab is too strong for me to work there.
Link

If you're intrigued by the science of perfumery, check out the excellent book The Emperor of Scent. And for a wonderfully creepy novel, read Perfume: The Story of a Murderer.

UPDATE: A slew of BB readers ask that when it comes to scent-related fiction, we not forget Tom Robbins's Jitterbug Perfume.
 

Bad cops to wear Hello Kitty armbands

Cops in Thailand who litter, park illegally, arrive late, or break other rules will be punished with office work and a Hello Kitty pink armband they'll have to wear at the station. From the Associated Press:
"Simple warnings no longer work. This new twist is expected to make them feel guilt and shame and prevent them from repeating the offense, no matter how minor," said Pongpat, acting chief of the Crime Suppression Division in Bangkok.

"(Hello) Kitty is a cute icon for young girls. It's not something macho police officers want covering their biceps," Pongpat said.
Link (Thanks, Sean Ness!)
 

Billboard made "transparent"

 V2 Img Img 46B50F1236Ac0 Full
Artist Cayetano Ferrer photographed the trees hidden by a 30-foot wide billboard in Daejeon, Korea and then pasted the image on the billboard. He purposely left part of the billboard white and put that missing piece of the image on another smaller billboard nearby. Link

Previously on BB:
• Cayetano Ferrer's "erased" products displayed on city street Link
• Transparent street signs Link

UPDATE: Here is a Chief Magazine interview with Kasia Kesicka, another artist who turns billboards transparent. Link
 

Happy birthday, Charles Fort!

Today is the birthday of Charles Fort (August 6, 1874 - May 3, 1932), highly-influential researcher of anomalous phenomena. He nearly lived in libraries studying bizarre news events--from frogs falling from the sky, to mysterious appearances and disappearances, to UFOs. Everything he encountered, he looked at with his mind wide open. Quite simply, Fort didn't believe in belief. In celebration of Fort, here's a great Fort quote hand-picked by my cryptozoologist/Fortean pal Loren Coleman:
Fort Charles 1920 "We are not realists. We are not idealists. We are intermediatists — that nothing is real, but that nothing is unreal: that all phenomena are approximations one way or the other between realness and unrealness." --Charles Fort, Lo!
Link to Fort's Wikipedia page, Link to buy The Complete Books of Charles Fort, Link to Cryptomundo post, Link to Fortean Times

Previously on BB:
• Philosophy of Charles Fort Link
• 1948 Fate magazine article about Charles Fort Link
 

Legal code is more like the Windows kernel than Project Gutenberg

Dan Kaminsky has produced slides showing the "information density" of several different blocks of text, including the corpus of Project Gutenberg, the Windows kernel, and the US legal code. The conclusion? The law has more structural similarities to software code than to the prose in Gutenberg's 17,000 books: "Legalese is a massively structured dialect. Symbols appear in very distinct patterns that are more reminiscent of machine code than text." Link
 

Murals of South (and North!) Philadelphia

Time's photo-essay on the murals of South and North! Philly has some stunners in it -- I've seen a number of these in person and I never thought a photo (especially one as small and ungenerous as the ones that Time has put online) could do them justice, but these are very good indeed. I like the shots of the works in progress and the artists, too. Link (via Make)

Update: Thanks to everyone who wrote to point out that some of these murals are in North Philly!

 

GayGamer site DDoSed

Kotaku's Brian Ashcraft sez, "Gay Gamer, the first daily game news site geared for LGBT, was attacked by a Philly-based hacker. The site was completely hosed. As one of our commenters pointed out, this is the Internet equivalent of arson."
Flynn De Marco, the site's owner and Kotaku weekend editor, said small waves of denial of service attacks started Wednesday morning, causing occasional timeouts on the site. By Friday the site, working with their host, was able to block the IPs where the DOS attacks seemed to be coming from. Then Friday evening someone began flooding the site's forums and chat room with hate speech, including some death threats, and over-sized images meant to bog down the site, De Marco said. The flood of messages and images all originated from the same IP in Philidelphia, he added.
Link
 

Medeco "unpickable" locks picked and pwned

Dave sez, "So the formerly unpickable/unbumpable high security locks Medeco has made for 30 years and that are used everywhere from the White House to the Pentagon have been compromised with picking bumping. I took the photos, and was paid by Wired to do so (and to cover Defcon in general)."

To demonstrate their crack of Medeco's M3 lock for Wired News, Tobias took a lock and inserted one of the keys that he and his researchers designed from Medeco's codes. Then he hit it several times with a bump hammer and turned the key.

The deadbolt was opened just as quickly with an even simpler technique using the wire shim and screwdriver. Tobias pointed out, however, that this cracking technique works only on deadbolts that have a single-sided key entry with a flip switch on one side, not on deadbolts that require a key on both sides of the lock.

Link (Thanks, Dave!)
 

Survey: Average Brits hate DRM

Entertainment Media Research's 2007 survey of UK music fans was very broad, looking at what "normal," non-geeky Brits want in music. The conclusion? Most fans don't want DRM -- not just the tech-savvy fans, but everyone from grannies to kids. As Ars Technica points out, the entertainment industry often dismisses anti-DRM sentiment as "unrepresentative" of the mainstream, but this survey suggests that the word is spreading: DRM music is defective by design.
First, the bird's eye view: 68 percent of those with opinions on the matter say that the only music worth purchasing is that which is DRM-free. Yet less than half (39 percent) are willing to pay a little extra for it, while 18 percent say that they'd rather save a little dough and keep the DRM if they had to chose between the two. In the middle is a mass of people with no opinion on the matter, because they're not sure what DRM is or don't know their preference. That will likely soon change.
Link
 
« a day earlier August 5, 2007
August 6, 2007
a day later » August 7, 2007