Many of you wrote in to respond to
yesterday's reader-submitted item about the closure of a television network in Venezuela.
As a friendly reminder, whenever text is presented on BoingBoing in blockquotes, you're reading the quoted words of someone, and not the blog-voice of a BoingBoing editor.
That said -- many BoingBoing readers shared opinions about the media turmoil in Venezuela.
Emil says,
While normally a station
losing a license would be a sad thing, this is a TV station that
actively supported a coup against Chavez in 2002, and was partially
responsible for the violence and deaths that took place at this time.
These events, including the role of RCTV and others are well
documented in the (award-winning) film "The Revolution will not be
televised".
I'd like to draw your attention to the following article by the
"Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting" group:
"Coup Co-Conspirators as Free-Speech Martyrs"
Craig Brozefsky says,
The article you quoted from Anonimo regarding the RCTV shutdown
completely fails to provide any context for the shutdown (a refusal to
renew their license), or the process by which it was carried out and
why. RCTV was a major participant in the April 2002 coup, as detailed
in these articles.
If you want to see footage of RCTV and the other channels who
supported the coup and how they did so, please check out The
Revolution Will Not Be Televised, an excellent documentary by an Irish
documentary film maker who was in Caracas at the time of the coup.
Venezuelanalysis article: Link. ZNet article: Link.
Felipe Ledesma says,
The venezuelan situation is a very complex one. There is a lot of radicalization, so you will find very opposite POVs. But one small comment: Chavez rise to power came after a failed coup and the actual Ministry of Interior, Jesse Chacon, assasinated some workers when they assalted the goverment channel (the same one they have now under their control) during that coup attempt. This is a matter of free speech. Thanks for listening.
Carlos Martinez says,
While I too
think it is a bad idea, it is a litle more complex
than is being presented. I was in Venezuela during the
coup of 2002 and watched the private media coverage
daily. It was incendiary and flgrantly
anti-democratic. That station is guilty of faking
footage of violence in order to incite further
violence, and guilty of hiding the truth about what
was really happening from the electorate. I am no
pro-Chavez partisan, but I was genuinely horrified by
the coverage of the coup. Does this justify its
closing? No, but their calls for press freedoms ring a
bit hypocritical after their gross manipulations and
lying.
Tyson Schwertner says,
Although I am not a Chavez worshiper nor do I live in Venezuela, the article concerning RCTV seems flawed.
Firstly, it is not being shut down. Chavez is not renewing the license for the use of the public airwaves.
The can still broadcast over cable, internet, and satellite. Secondly, the poster failed to mention that RCTV openly supported and helped a coup of his government that was partially successful. Chavez did not shut it down immediately
but allowed the contract to expire 5 years later.
He also allows other networks that are openly critical of him to continue, just not the ones that tell people to overthrow a democratically elected government.
It seems plausible that the US would do the same if ABC openly supported and helped enact a coup of the government.
This article sums it up better than i can, if you are interested. (not intended to be a bb link suggestion) It includes a few examples of similar actions in the US and UK and interviews with those opposing Chavez's decision.
Again, I have a plenty of criticisms of Chavez but in this case I do not think he is impairing free speech, at least not in the way it was presented on boingboing. I am open to being completely wrong though.
protoRoB says,
First off all, not only the problem was the exit off the public signal
from rctv, the thing is that the goverment is intimidating to the Cable television
against the possibility to transmit via this way.
We know that is not the same but at least is something for us the venezuelans
almost everybody have cable tv acces, the poor people too, believeme
This is a very extrange country, i'm not saying it in the bad sense off the word
we are a very wonderfull yet extrange society.
The second point is the potential expropiation of the MICROWAVE (microondas) transmition
stations, the new channel Tves, wich is now in the old RCTV frequency (que cagada coño!)
but is using a big part of the equipment of rctv wich they say is just a momentary resource
untill they build their own structure for broadcasting the new channel.
But here, in this wonderfull yet extrange country, we all know that there is nothing more permanent than the provisional.
and that is a very sad thing in this case.
The new channel is not bad at all, sincerely, at least by now is very aceptable
we aspect not anther channel like Venezolana de Television (the country's public tv channel)
wich is almost "the Chavez´ propaganda channel"
The new Tves is wat VTV is suposed to be.
This is a personal opinion Xeni, i know there are lots of things that i don´t know in that respect
as many persons in venezuela, but this is an obvius violation to the freedom of speech.
devophill
Lou Jing, half black Chinese girl, sparks race debate in Chi
lessgravity
100-word fiction competition — win an HP MediaSmart EX
guernican
Lou Jing, half black Chinese girl, sparks race debate in Chi
ueannossioba
100-word fiction competition — win an HP MediaSmart EX
Antiqueight
100-word fiction competition — win an HP MediaSmart EX
jstewart
100-word fiction competition — win an HP MediaSmart EX
guernican
Lou Jing, half black Chinese girl, sparks race debate in Chi
grigri
100-word fiction competition — win an HP MediaSmart EX
thekevinmonster
100-word fiction competition — win an HP MediaSmart EX
Michael Smith
Lou Jing, half black Chinese girl, sparks race debate in Chi