
Two weeks ago, I
blogged about an anti-sweatshop demonstration at the University of Southern California, where I'm teaching for a year as part of a Fulbright Chair. The students were seeking a meeting with USC President Sample.
They've been trying to meet with the President for eight years.
They still haven't met with him.
The students come from a group called SCALE, a campus organization that is part of a larger movement called the Worker Rights Consortium. They are pushing USC to adopt a code of conduct and a "Designated Supplier Program, both aimed at eliminating the use of sweatshop labor in licensed USC merchandise (USC overflows with garments and tchotchkes emblazoned with the university logo, mascot, sports team, etc).
One group of SCALE protestors held up banners and picketed outside the building housing the President's office. A smaller group (initially 14, later 13) actually occupied the President's office, sitting in and refusing to leave when asked.
The issue of labor conditions in USC's merchandise program is a complex one. USC is a member of something called The Fair Labor Association, which welcomes representatives from manufacturing concerns, such as Nike, on its board of directors. It, too, has a code of conduct, which is substantively similar to the one offered by the Worker Rights Consortium. The biggest difference between the two organizations is in how they approach enforcement: the FLA enforces its policies through inspections. The WRC uses unions -- the Designated Supplier Program requires members to buy from union shops. The theory is that inspectors keep factories honest and humane only at inspection time, while unions safeguard workers for the duration.
However, Liz Kennedy, USC's Licensing Director, says that the Preferred Suppliers Program doesn't confront the reality of manufacturing, requiring that manufacturers do the primary sewing and the logoing at the same time. Many suppliers buy generic pre-made garments and add logos later.
Both sides make good points, but the university administration also says some genuinely silly things -- for example, both university spokesman James Grant and Vice President Michael Jackson suggested that it was impossible for SCALE to have been requesting a meeting with the President for eight years, since the membership of the organization rotates as students graduate, and none of the students in the group today were enrolled eight years ago. SCALE, one supposes, is reborn every term, a new organization.
If this is so, then the same thing must be true of other campus organizations -- for example, the football team, the Trojans, doesn't have the same students playing on it today as were playing on it in 1999. All those trophies that "the Trojans" won were therefore in fact won by other teams, playing in a separate, distinct slice of time-space, unrelated to the present team.