Wednesday, August 25, 2004
Porn Law Draws Adult Sites' Ire
In today's Wired News, a story I filed about a new Department of Justice proposal to require more stringent record-keeping of pornstar identities. The move is drawing fire from adult webmasters. If enacted, they say the new regs may make it tough for adult sites to stay in business.
"The internet is an international entity. This could be yet another incentive for websites to set up business elsewhere," said [business partner of veteran erotic photographer Suse Randall] Humphry Knipe. "This isn't a big deal for Hustler or Playboy, but what about some guy who operates a website out of his basement? Will he have to let agents into his home?"Link to Wired News story "Porn Law Draws Adult Sites' Ire".Another requirement raising the ire of porn webmasters is a clause requiring that a statement regarding the location of the custodian of records be published in a typeface at least as large as that in which performers, producers, directors or company owners are displayed.
"If 'Playboy' is printed in 180 point type on a magazine cover, the 2257 disclosure would also have to be displayed in 180 point type," says DeWitt. "If you keep names in smaller size type, the law says it can't be smaller than 11 point type -- how does that work on websites or videotape, where font size is measured differently?"
"I could make a good case for the idea that these regulations are designed to harass people in the adult industry. We already have tough anti-child-porn laws," says DeWitt. "I see no good reason for many of these conditions, other than imposing an unnecessary harassment for people in a business which is a stated enemy of the Bush administration."
A BoingBoing extra: First Amendment attorney and AVN columnist Clyde DeWitt, who I interviewed for this story, submitted an extensive set of opposing comments to the DoJ yesterday. You can read them here Link (PDF, 37 pages, 216K)
posted by Xeni Jardin at 10:34:16 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments












