Meng and dha connected using talk on Schwern's laptop and we spent a good 100 miles just finding things to talk about. That's what happens when you work hard to build something that's minimally useful.Link Discuss (via 802.11b Networking News)After rambling on about movies, making fun of each other's driving and deciding where to stop for dinner we decided to connect our network to the Internet. After all, we needed to send out proof that this was working. Once my cell phone reached a state of moderately reliable service, Meng brought up the link. We logged on to IRC and bragged about our connectivity. We sent email stating our coordinates. We acted like little children on sugar highs.
Mobile wireless -- really, really mobile and really, really wireless
Beetle Bailey strides boldly into the mid-1990s
Mort Walker has added a new character to the Beetle Bailey pantheon. Chip Gizmo shows up at Camp Swampy, bedecked with such futuristic props as a PDA and a cellphone, and hilarity ensues: "So goes the humor that will follow Chip Gizmo into Camp Swampy, as the computer specialist faces off with old-fashioned Gen. Halftrack. For example, when Gizmo warns Halftrack not to use his pop-out CD-ROM holder for a coffee cup holder, the general relents. Next, Gizmo finds him using it to hold his martini glass." Oh, oh, oh, my sides.
Link
Discuss
(Thanks, Sean!)
Fred von Lohmann shreds WiFi FUD
It's not actually true, though. As my colleague Fred "Baron" von Lohmann posted to the Pho list:
Hey, it seems to me that anyone who runs an open wireless gateway would be protected from copyright liability arising out of the activities of their neighbors by the DMCA 512(a) safe harbor (the same one that AT&T itself relies on).Ain't that the sweetest? All the breaks that the ISP lobbies have secured for themselves in Congress apply to anyone who provides access to the Internet, including folks like you and me!So long as you simply pass bits for someone else, without changing or storing them, you're not liable if the bits are infringing. See 17 USC 512(a). (Before you start going on about "notice and takedown" and copyright agents -- none of that mumbo jumbo applies to the 512(a) safe harbor, 'cuz the ISPs had enough clout to make it that way).
So AT&T is blowing smoke -- it's immune from liability for carrying the bits, and so is the subscriber who is running the wireless gateway.
I've been saying it for some time now -- soon we'll *all* be ISPs, and all entitled to the same protections that AOL legislated for itself over the last few years.
The most insidious thing about this genre of anti-WiFi FUD is that it attacks the idea of anonymity online, as though allowing people to anonymously access the Internet was an irresponsible activity that can only serve the interests of terrorists, child pornographers and warez d00ds.
In fact, anonymous speech is Constitutionally protected in the USA. The Federalist Papers were published anonymously. Whistle-blowers, kids who are curious about STDs and dissidents (just to name three) rely on anonymity to participate in the democratic discourse. Link Discuss (Thanks, Fred!)
Happy Birthday, Mr. Dragon!
Mozilla bookmark group swapping: a proof of concept
Why do this? I dunno. I have an idea that there could be an RSS aggregator or similar that outputted Moz tab-bookmark files. Wouldn't it be cool if every morning, you sat down to your browser and had a tab-file that would load up all the day's news stories (say, every link from the previous day's Boing Boing or Wired News or Slashdot) -- click it before you take your shower, and by the time you're done, voila, tabbed newspaper! Link Discuss
Infographic bonanza
Jam-session for game designers
They just had their first show, and created 12 games in four days! Link Discuss
Mesh networking from Mitsubishi
As a result, any one of these devices could be the host for Internet access: One person subscribes to an ISP for $20 per month, and everyone can hop across devices until they reach that host and log on.Link Discuss (via Werblog)It reminds me of the '60s when everyone's goal was to defeat the "establishment" through fairly harmless guerrilla tactics such as not putting a stamp on the envelope when paying a Ma Bell phone bill. Is this more dangerous? The ISPs might think so.


the latest
latest episodes